[aerogear-dev] Authentication issues

[Sebastien Blanc]

Ok but do we really want again another repo beside the (coming) showcase
repo, the todo, aerodoc ... Just asking because I'm not against a "sandbox"
repo but OTP and paging could be integrated into the showcase app ...



On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
> wrote:

> +1 on JAX-RS and the renaming of the repo
>
>
> On 9 September 2013 18:17, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:38:35PM +0200, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > ATM yes, why? Because we make use of entities from the IDM. But there
>> > > are many solutions to this problem.
>> > >
>> > > - Implement your own User on the server (only for ag-demo aka the good
>> > > ol' AeroGearUser)
>> > > - Change the way how AG controller parse these parameters
>> > > - Send those credentials on HTTP header
>> > > - Get rid off AG controller and implement it on JAX-RS (I would vote
>> for
>> > > this one)
>> > >
>> > +1 but in this case the repo itself doesn't make  much sense since is
>> > called  aerogear-controller-demo :) or rename it like
>> "aerogear-sandbox" to
>> > show OTP, paging etc ... ?
>>
>> +1 to JAX-RS and +1 to renaming the repo.
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130910/5798c8da/attachment.html