[aerogear-dev] to use or not to use aerogear-ios-http as agerogear-ios-push dependency?

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Guys
>
> Since AGIOS-255 (Basic/Digest auth for aerogear-ios-http) is under review
> and will be merged soon, one question that pops up is: shall we use
> ag-ios-http lib to support push registration in Swift lib
> (aerogear-ios-push). So far we’ve been using plain NSURLSession to do it as
> it wasn’t yet ready on http lib.
>

I think there are two sides of it:
- eat your own dog food
- does it really make sense - looking at the "remove 2 lines, but will add
dependency"..... sounds like does not really make sense :)

I am fine in keeping it as it is.

Thanks for the insights!

-M



>
> Doing so will remove 2 lines of boiler plate code but will add a
> dependency (although internal to aerogear). As either ways seem fine for
> me, I’d like to have your views on it.
>
> ++
> Corinne
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141201/1a45799f/attachment.html