[aerogear-dev] [POC] Unified Geo Server

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Thu Dec 11 09:13:48 EST 2014


On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com> wrote:

> Better show than tell, but I have nothing to show at the moment :(
>
> The problem with the current console is that the sidebar as a main
> navigation doesn't allow for sub navigation or expansions. We are
> researching with Matt and Gabriel applying paternally and how to adapt it
> to mobile products.


ah, you mean generic - not specific to this POC.

For this POC, let's just focus on the RESTful endpoints, not the UI at the
moment - it's a proof of concepts, not more

-M



> There has been a lot of talk internally in the UX team but I haven't been
> able to start with it until yesterday.
>
> Since changing the console is not a short term goal, please give me a
> couple of days to work on it and I'll share as I have things to share.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org>
> To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 4:53:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] [POC] Unified Geo Server
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Andres Galante < agalante at redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
> +1
> We are thinking of this kind of scenarios for the next step on the console
> UI.
>
> Can you explain more?
>
>
>
> The way we have the navigation now it is not flexible enough. Hopefully
> I'll have updates on console UX to share with you soon :)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Corinne Krych" < corinnekrych at gmail.com >
> To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" < aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:55:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] [POC] Unified Geo Server
>
> Nice POC indeed, it makes things more concrete.
>
> Looking at the the similar process for UGS and UPS and thinking we might
> need similar mini/micro services, I think eventually we will benefit having
> a form of aggregator where you say: create an app for UPS with plugin UGS,
> under the cover, 2 app ids are created and unified with one appId + a map
> of corresponding app ids.
> With the same idea some of the admin console for creating app could be
> mutualised.
>
> This is more a ‘for the future’ improvement and does not interfere with
> your POC.
>
> ++
> Corinne
>
> > On 10 Dec 2014, at 17:12, Sebastien Blanc < scm.blanc at gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andres Galante < agalante at redhat.com >
> wrote:
> > Nice work Sebastien!
> > If you I can help with app or console design, please let me know.
> > Thanks ! A good strategy would probably to follow the Push Server and
> LiveOak (Angular/patternfly) model.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sebastien Blanc" < scm.blanc at gmail.com >
> > To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" < aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 12:28:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] [POC] Unified Geo Server
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Erik Jan de Wit < edewit at redhat.com >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Really nice, looks great already, one question how do I use the data
> > from the geo search to send push notifications?
> > When the device registers to the geo server, it also provides an
> "alias". The idea is that the developer has to use the same "alias" when
> registering to the UPS, then it's up to the backend app to retrieve the
> aliases for the geoserver and use these as criteria when sending a push
> notif to UPS.
> > It tried to described that here :
> https://github.com/sebastienblanc/unified-geo-server#integration-with-push
> >
> > One idea for the alias, is to use the Keycloak (or whatever auth system)
> username as alias to have it somehow "unified"
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141211/9afd1c92/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list