[aerogear-dev] SITE: API Documentation and Specifications

[Bruno Oliveira]

Before I do big changes at the document I would like to suggest
something like this for security:
https://gist.github.com/abstractj/78bd79b47be666b3b355

The motivation of separate it per functionality/feature is to provide at
the security user guide an introduction about each topic, gotchas and
etc.

Thoughts?

On 2014-12-17, Andres Galante wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've done a re arrange of things as i see fit [1]. I am sure its not the correct thing so please make changes here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CcYGrKLWzFnEgfR43YSxaHi4DRnf2t2p5qAniCgcVUg/edit?usp=sharing
>
> [1] https://github.com/andresgalante/aerogearwebsite/blob/master/docs_structure/feature.markdown
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org>
> To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 11:15:38 AM
> Subject: [aerogear-dev] SITE: API Documentation and Specifications
>
> Hi,
>
> looking at andresgalante's long and scary list ( https://github.com/andresgalante/aerogearwebsite/blob/master/docs_structure/current.markdown )
>
> I think for the "API Documentation and Specifications", we could perhaps break that down into two differrent things:
>
> #API Documentations
>
> ##Mobile SDK API Documentation (not sure about the name)
> * AeroGear JS 2.0.0
> * AeroGear iOS Http v0.1
> * AeroGear iOS Oauth2 v0.1
> * AeroGear-Push iOS 1.0.0
> * AeroGear-OTP iOS 1.0.0
> * AeroGear-Crypto iOS 0.2.3
> * AeroGear Android 1.4.0
> * AeroGear Android Auth 2.0.0-alpha.1
> * AeroGear Android Authz 2.0.0-alpha.1
> * AeroGear Android Pipe 2.0.0-alpha.1
> * AeroGear Android Push 2.0.0-alpha.1
> * AeroGear Android Security 2.0.0-alpha.1
> * AeroGear Android Store 2.0.0-alpha.1
> * AeroGear Cordova (lacks version?)
>
> ##Push API Docs
> * AeroGear UnifiedPush RESTful APIs - stable
> * AeroGear UnifiedPush RESTful APIs - development
> * AeroGear UnifiedPush Java Client - Version 1.0.0
> * AeroGear UnifiedPush Node.js Client (lacks version?)
> * AeroGear SimplePush Java Client (lacks version?)
>
> (yes, I removed some of the items, as I think they are not relevant in here (see earlier email))
>
>
> #Specifications
>
> ##Sync Specifications
> * Client API Proposals
> * Server API Proposals
>
>
> These will be hopefully soon be gone and we have, similar to 'push' specific API Docs for Sync (client/server)
>
>
> Any thoughts ?
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914