[aerogear-dev] AeroGear & Ceylon Android support

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:

> This document?
> http://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearRoadMap/
>
> I notice there are no years, just months, allows for flexibility :-)
>

+1


>
>
> On Jan 22, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> wrote:
>
>> That's what roadmaps stand for, no?
>
>
> Yeah
>
>
>
>
>> —
>> abstractj
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Does the overall team have a list of priorities? Things like:
>> Investigate Keycloak integration
>> Investigate Vert.x runtime vs Java EE runtime
>> Investigate LiveOak integration
>> Create and/or Improve Unified Push Server + Cordova + JBoss Tools Getting
>> Started Docs/Videos
>> etc
>>
>> It is easy for me to "lose sight of the forest for the trees" in Jira  :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Y'All,
>>
>> Saw the other day that the Ceylon[1] team has been working on some
>> Android support, especially around their tooling.  Here are some links:
>>
>> ceylon-dev list posts:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ceylon-dev/BNqosBRDuSI/WuqUWfxraQcJ
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ceylon-dev/n2ZfmaW-I2M/GhZVEa_uV44J
>>
>> I had a quick chat with Gavin about this, and we think it could be neat
>> if we look into how we might be able to collaborate and/or provide some
>> feedback on their Android support and tooling.
>>
>>
>> sounds interesting, and taking a look does not hurt
>>
>>
>>
>> There could be some interesting ways to integrate between the projects :-)
>>
>>
>> sure, however, I think if we are now taking a (deeper) look at Keycloak,
>> perhaps thats something to focus on for now.
>>
>> However, as said, doing some sort of evaluation for a few days, and see
>> if ours works there etc, would be a nice task.
>>
>>
>> I agree, the keycloak integration is a higher priority.  I just wanted to
>> raise this as a interesting opportunity not a "drop everything" and look :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> - Jay
>>
>> [1] http://ceylon-lang.org/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://w <http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140124/1df1ce65/attachment.html