[aerogear-dev] UPS admin-ui distribution compiled by frontend-maven-plugin

Lucas Holmquist lholmqui at redhat.com
Mon Jun 2 09:09:47 EDT 2014


On Jun 2, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
> Good morning, I have some n00b questions. What happens with web
> developer or node developers who don't care about Maven?
> 
> Generally that's a huge problem: requiring maven for 'web folks'; For 'pure' JS/Web projects I'd be -1 on something like this
> 
> However this case here is different, IMO;
> To build the entire UPS, maven is the tool and the admin-ui itself (standalone) is pretty useless;
not entirely,  i was messing around with creating a node.js version of the UPS( following the spec's ),  and i was able to just copy the admin UI to it and it worked.



> 
> 
> -Matthias
> 
>  
> Is still
> possible to make use of pure node to build admin-ui?
> 
> Speaking about the downsides:
> 
> I think this might be a concern, if is necessary to fix something at each Node
> upgrade.
> 
> > * he had some issues himself to get it work, especially during Node
> upgrades
> > * stability of the build can be questionable
> 
> I'm not sure about the negative influence if is possible to choose. Could you
> please elaborate?
> 
> > * it can negatively influence developers that are not aware of Node
> tooling
> 
> My latest question is: do we really need this? why?
> 
> On 2014-05-29, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > we would like to evaluate "frontend-maven-plugin" [1] that could be used as
> > a mean to compile admin-ui distribution files into ag-push.war webapp
> > during Maven build time
> >
> > This way we would enable people not familiar with node/npm/bower/grunt
> > tooling to compile latest and greatest,
> >
> > and additionally avoid a need to compile and save into git repository.
> >
> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-672
> >
> > Note1: web developer will still leverage Node tooling
> >
> > Note2: this is post UPS 0.11.0 thing! ;-)
> >
> >
> > As pointed out in the JIRA, this may have its downsides,
> >
> > so if anyone has some concerns please speak up now. :-)
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > ~ Lukas
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/eirslett/frontend-maven-plugin
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> --
> 
> abstractj
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140602/8d557d00/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list