[aerogear-dev] UPS admin-ui distribution compiled by frontend-maven-plugin

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Mon Jun 2 11:55:43 EDT 2014


On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:17:04 +0200
> Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> > running againt master is IMO also using the latest development;
> >
> > If folks want stable, have them use released versions, instead of master
>
> Correct but the plugin would hide the fact there are two masters involved.


two masters? master in terms of git?


> If
> we had UI as <dependency> with version -SNAPSHOT in pom.xml, that's a
> different
> thing.
>

as said earlier, I think Keycloak does that. But I am not sure on the
details of the UI bundling


>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I like this idea due to fact it reduces number of manual steps needed
> to
> > > build
> > > UPS server WAR via a single command. Ideal for JS noobs such as myself.
> > >
> > > I don't like the fact that it could introduce test result
> inconsistencies,
> > > e.g.:
> > >
> > > Alice: I can't register new variant via UI.
> > > Bob: Which UPS version are you running?
> > > Alice: Latest from master.
> > > Bob: Works for me.
> > > ...both debugging...
> > > Bob: Can you rebuild UPS? There was new UI with the fix committed
> > > meanwhile.
> > >
> > > So, I believe that adding such plugin is a good idea if we keep UPS
> track a
> > > specific non-movable commit from UI repository.
> > >
> > > Karel
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 29 May 2014 13:43:02 +0200
> > > Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey guys,
> > > >
> > > > we would like to evaluate "frontend-maven-plugin" [1] that could be
> used
> > > as
> > > > a mean to compile admin-ui distribution files into ag-push.war webapp
> > > > during Maven build time
> > > >
> > > > This way we would enable people not familiar with
> node/npm/bower/grunt
> > > > tooling to compile latest and greatest,
> > > >
> > > > and additionally avoid a need to compile and save into git
> repository.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-672
> > > >
> > > > Note1: web developer will still leverage Node tooling
> > > >
> > > > Note2: this is post UPS 0.11.0 thing! ;-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As pointed out in the JIRA, this may have its downsides,
> > > >
> > > > so if anyone has some concerns please speak up now. :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > ~ Lukas
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/eirslett/frontend-maven-plugin
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140602/e2988565/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list