[aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush Server domain model

Karel Piwko kpiwko at redhat.com
Wed Jun 11 09:38:29 EDT 2014


+1 on not having separate table per variant type and using different
inheritance model here - for instance a discriminator column.

Karel

On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:14:21 +0200
Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Right now the domain model of the UnifiedPush Server has the variants split
> into separate collections. 
> 
> https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/api/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/api/PushApplication.java#L44-L50
> 
> This could be improved to only use one collection, we’ll get more
> extendibility (adding another variant type for instance) and remove code like
> this:
> 
> https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/jpa/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/jpa/dao/impl/JPAPushApplicationDao.java#L93-L96
> 
> In places where you only want the iOS variants for instance you could either
> query them, or have a getter that collects them by type.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 	Cheers,
> 		Erik Jan
> 



More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list