[aerogear-dev] Current status of UPS 0.11.0

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Bom Dia!


On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
wrote:

> Good morning peeps,
>
> First I would like to thank Bill Burke, Stian, Sebastien and Lukas for
> dedicating
> their time helping with Keycloak integration.
>

Great to hear! :-)


>
> I think we are almost done, this is the current branch:
> https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js.
> And now most
> of issues were gone and is also possible to display the current logged
> in user.
>
> Now I'm working on fix the sender endpoint, to be more precise we need
> to remove the HTTP basic authentication for sending push messages
> now that most of the endpoints are protect by Keycloak.


Is the reason here that the 'sending endpoint' is also accessed from the
AdminUI, for the 'compose a push' feature?

If it's really required I am OK with that. However, I'd prefer to avoid it,
as changing the behaviour of one of our two HTTP_BASIC endpoints ('device
registration' and 'sending') also requires changes/updates on the relevant
client SDKs.

Greetings,
Matthias




> If you try to
> send a push message based on my branch you will see the basic
> authentication form atm.
>
> If you have a better idea, I'm all ears.
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140617/227598f4/attachment.html