[aerogear-dev] Current status of UPS 0.11.0

[Bruno Oliveira]

On 2014-06-17, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
> Btw,
>
> are we ready to merge keycloak.js branch into master and continue work
> there?

Thanks for helping on it Lukáš. I would like to stabilize that branch
before and make sure that everything is working fine, but if you guys
feel like it should be merged, that's ok.

>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I've did some stabilizations inside the Bruno's keycloak.js branch and
> > then rebased it against master.
> >
> > I've also shared this branch on aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server
> > repo, so we could all work on it:
> >
> > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js
> >
> >
> > Dan, I believe this branch should fix issues you were seeing.
> >
> > ~ Lukas
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Bom Dia!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Good morning peeps,
> >>>
> >>> First I would like to thank Bill Burke, Stian, Sebastien and Lukas for
> >>> dedicating
> >>> their time helping with Keycloak integration.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Great to hear! :-)
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I think we are almost done, this is the current branch:
> >>> https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js.
> >>> And now most
> >>> of issues were gone and is also possible to display the current logged
> >>> in user.
> >>>
> >>> Now I'm working on fix the sender endpoint, to be more precise we need
> >>> to remove the HTTP basic authentication for sending push messages
> >>> now that most of the endpoints are protect by Keycloak.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is the reason here that the 'sending endpoint' is also accessed from the
> >> AdminUI, for the 'compose a push' feature?
> >>
> >> If it's really required I am OK with that. However, I'd prefer to avoid
> >> it, as changing the behaviour of one of our two HTTP_BASIC endpoints
> >> ('device registration' and 'sending') also requires changes/updates on the
> >> relevant client SDKs.
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> If you try to
> >>> send a push message based on my branch you will see the basic
> >>> authentication form atm.
> >>>
> >>> If you have a better idea, I'm all ears.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> abstractj
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >
> >

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--

abstractj