[aerogear-dev] Let's change the AeroGear Twitter account handle

[Jay Balunas]

On Feb 21, 2014, at 12:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
> I still can't see what the real value added on it. Everyone knows that there's a team behind it, so I can't see why "_team", also do we plan to create handles for "AeroGearPush", "AeroGearSecurity"...if yes,
> 
> not sure on all these twitter handles. I'd vote -1 on all these accounts

+1 on the -1 for additional handles.

> 
>  
> that makes sense. And "_project", well we know,
> 
> _project or _team - I think both is fine. I never really thought too much about it (team vs. project).

I would go with _team as it is shorter, although #aerogear_org I also like and is 1 character less than team.

We'll need to take a vote here, or come to some conclusion - I think it can be debated forever ;-)

> 
>  
> it's a project, the "s" on @aerogears always gave to me the sense of a bunch of people behind this to make it happen.
> 
> I think the "real problem" is folks think "AeroGears" is the name of the project
> 
> Wednesday I gave an AeroGear presentation. Due to the twitter handle of @AeroGears, two of those that asked questions, actually called the project AeroGears :))))
> And that's what I have noticed before, which is, I think, the reason why Hylke brought it up.
> 
> Unfortunately @AeroGear is taken, but I do think that @AeroGears is misleading - in terms of the name.
> 
> However, your "@aerogears always gave to me the sense of a bunch of people behind this to make it happen." is a good thought! Which is believe leads towards _team, right?
> 
> Again I never really interpreted too much into the meaning of the twitter handle, besides the fact that folks do not really get our name.
> 
> 
> Greetings,
> Matthias
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> Actually, @aerogear_project makes sense (see @netty_project)
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> @__aerogear or @_aerogear ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> **If** we're really forced to change, I'd go with @aerogear_project
> 
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> -- 
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140305/d2e990e7/attachment.html