[aerogear-dev] Staging of UnifiedPush Server 0.10.1

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thursday, March 13, 2014, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','matzew at apache.org');>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bsutter at redhat.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> By the way, I am really enjoying the new Test Message feature :-)
>>
>
> IT's not only a test message :)
> you can use that to just reach out to users :) (think marketing apps :) )
>
>
> Well, I do not yet consider it ready for marketing users. Mostly because
> of the security model - everybody is an admin - it would be bad if the
> marketing folks messed up the iOS cert for example.
>
> I believe we should have some form of read-only user role as well as a
> "message sending" only role - therefore the admin can protect all the other
> settings.
>


Was part of our user mgmt thread in nov/dec/jan


>
> This can wait until after 1.0, for now, just "push administrators" can
> send messages - useful for testing, sometimes in the case of emergency,
> however, I would not recommend giving all that power to the average
> marketing person.
>

Well, think small shops/agencies: IMO pretty much all they need

I agree we need improvements after 1.0 (e.g. Keycloak user roles etc).

But I'd also not "recommend" to _not_ use the UI for real pushes :-) BUT
yeah, not yet 100% enterprise


>
>
>
>
> curl is a pain and becomes problematic for our Windows userbase anyway.
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Deployed and tested with success !!
> +1
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> FYI:   On IRC Stefan reported the WAR from my staging repo also passes the
> tests.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Miklosovic <smikloso at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Stefan Miklosovic<smikloso at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Matthias,
>
> we executed UPS integration tests on the latest commit in 0.10.x brach
> (35d15c91b7b4f01902e2fdb6a61d60506439a67c) and tests passed ok.
>
>
>
> awesome!
>
>
> Since you talked about Bintray, we could move this little bit further and
> test
> staged bits directly from there - meaning wars which are not on Maven
> Central
> yet but they are already on Bintray would be downloaded from there
> dynamically
> and our intergration test suite would be run directly against built (but
> yet unreleased) wars.
>
>
>
> the WAR files from my private staging repo will be exactly those that I
> upload to bintray;
>
> I use the private repo, to avoid an early publish (before the release is
> really done)
>
> Ah, right. The discussion I had with Karel was that it would be nice to
> test these built wars before they
> finally reach Maven Central and Bintray would act as a staging place just
> as your private repo right now.
>
>
>
> feel free to use my private staging repo as your repo (it's a valid maven
> repo
>
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140313/40c1ce78/attachment.html