[aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results

Tue Mar 18 10:26:18 EDT 2014

> From: "Farah Juma" <fjuma at redhat.com>
> To: matzew at apache.org
> Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 9:57:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results
> 
> 
> > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org>
> > To: "Farah Juma" <fjuma at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:47:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Farah Juma <fjuma at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org>
> > > > To: "Farah Juma" <fjuma at redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 2:55:01 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Farah Juma <fjuma at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org>
> > > > > > To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List"
> > > > > > <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > > > > > Cc: "Farah Juma" <fjuma at redhat.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:14:05 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test
> > > results
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > status looks like:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Integration tests - passed
> > > > > > > * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > known problem; not sure - but there might be already a ticket for
> > > > > > it
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > * SP tests - passed
> > > > > > > * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > possible - we might have changed the data model between 0.9.x and
> > > 0.10.x
> > > > >
> > > > > Interesting, this would cause issues with modifying existing
> > > data/adding
> > > > > new data. As Karel noted on AGPUSH-563, it looks like we would need a
> > > > > migration strategy for DB schema changes.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > yep - I was thought that's part of the upgrade work; but we can file a
> > > > ticket to explicitly cover this
> > >
> > > That would be good. The database part of the upgrade is currently handled
> > > by the MySQL cartridge's "post_restore" action hook - this just restores
> > > the database to whatever it was before and doesn't handle schema changes:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://github.com/openshift/origin-server/blob/master/cartridges/openshift-origin-cartridge-mysql/bin/control#L140
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ok
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > Once the necessary MySQL commands for migrating data from 0.9.x to 0.10.x
> > > are defined, we could try adding them to the AeroGear cartridge's
> > > "post_restore" action hook.
> > >
> > 
> > With "necessary MySQL commands" you mean those that take care of the schema
> > changes?
> 
> Yes, exactly.
> 
> > I think generally having a migration script for the schema is a
> > nice thing to have, regardless of OpenShift. Once we are closer to our
> > 1.0.0 that's something we have to have.
> 
> +1
> 
> > Are you planing on adding these necessary MySQL commands (assuming they are
> > relevant for taking care of schema changes ;-)) for our cartridge? Or
> > should we just track that requirement in a JIRA for now ?
> 
> Let's track this requirement in a JIRA for now. I think it'll be easier for
> you guys to define the necessary commands as schema changes are being made.

I've created the following JIRA to track this:

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-564

Farah

> 
> > 
> > -Matthias
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > fixed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's minor, not sure we should really stop the process; especially
> > > the
> > > > > UPS
> > > > > > is now on staging/hold since one entire week
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have filled following bugs:
> > > > > > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562
> > > > > > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set
> > > > > > > network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Karel
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > > > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > 
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 