[aerogear-dev] AeroGear.js without jQuery Discussion

tolis emmanouilidis tolisemm at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 10:10:14 EDT 2014


2014-03-24 15:39 GMT+02:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>:

>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> I agree that it would be nice to implement AGJS-70<https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGJS-70> (Investigate
>> removing jQuery requirement). Meanwhile, there is an open source project on
>> GitHub that claims to offer a custom builder for jQuery in order to include
>> only the modules needed [1] [2]. I haven't tried it yet but maybe we could
>> create a custom jQuery build which includes only the parts currently needed
>> in AeroGear. This would mean a smaller size of the jQuery dependency.
>>
>>
>> The AG lib depends on a few parts of jQuery, the biggest being
>> jQuery.Ajax and the promise implementation.
>>
>> i know we can make custom builds of jQuery pretty easily( building from
>> source ),  but i don't really want to bundle it within our lib.
>>
>> and i don't think with bower we can do this easily. although they did
>> just add a post install hook, so perhaps that could be something to look at.
>>
>> Datamanager only uses the promise implementation of jQuery( and some
>> random thing for the filter method,  which could probably be updated ).
>>
>


> Promises are starting to become available natively in browsers and jQuery
>> doesn't use the Promise/A+ spec,  so it could be harder to fallback without
>> a shim of some kind
>>
>
Good to know. Thanks for providing this info.


>
> sounds reasonable to 'wait' on the promise side of things, and use that
> bit in the datamanager
>

+1


>>
>> while i don't really want to reinvent the wheel in terms of Ajax,  it
>> might be interesting to take a look.
>>
>
> Yeah, IMO worth to look there, for reducing dependencies
>
> -M
>
>
>

>
>
>>   I think in a previous ML thread about what 2.0 looked like,  that
>> Pipeline would maybe just be a JSON only thing, with exception for multipart
>>
>>
>>
@Lucas Thanks for making things clear


>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140324/cb593737/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list