[aerogear-dev] UPS Console US/Tech updates

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Mon Mar 31 05:04:49 EDT 2014


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> After talking with Thomas about how liveoak has been working I think
>>> their approach to tracking there work there is a good approach.  Take a
>>> look at these jira's for an example.
>>>
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/LIVEOAK-91
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/LIVEOAK-80
>>>
>>> Is this something we could do for our upcoming console and tech
>>> migration efforts?  This will also make it a lot easier for us to judge
>>> where we are, and what work is left.  Especially when we have assistance
>>> from others (such as some on the LiveOak team).
>>>
>>
>>
>> for the 'overall' work on doing the actual overhaul of the AdminUI for
>> the UnifiedPush Server, I created this JIRA/Epic already:
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-573
>>
>> Not sure, but perhaps we can make the following tickets become epics as
>> well:
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-575
>>  https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-576
>>
>> where they have a bunch of sub-tasks. One sub-task per page. That would
>> give as an exact list of steps
>>
>
> +1 let's break that into smaller sub-tasks like : Application Screen /
> Variant Screen / Installation Screen / KC / Login Integration.
>

OK - let me do that



>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Another area that Thomas and I talked about was the UX/HTML/CSS reviews
>>> and reuse.  The updated mockups from Hylke [1] are obviously quite similar
>>> to LiveOak's console.  There should be quite a bit of overlap with core
>>> HTML and CSS that should make it easier for Hylke to produce what we need.
>>>  Any help that Gabriel will be able to assist, advise, and review which
>>> should help a lot.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>
> For sure, we have to be efficient here and reuse all what is possible. We
> must also keep a close eye on this project
> https://github.com/patternfly/angular-patternfly which will help us a lot
> to align with LO (since these angular directive will be the one extracted
> from the LO project)).
>
>
>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Jay
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/blob/master/ups-new-ux/application-details-blue.png
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140331/b52ce115/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list