[aerogear-dev] Modularization and Push

Summers Pittman supittma at redhat.com
Mon Mar 31 10:06:42 EDT 2014


On Mon 31 Mar 2014 10:05:05 AM EDT, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com
> <mailto:supittma at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Y'all,
>
>     So there has been some concerns with the complexity of the build
>     especially where including the Google GCM (push) libraries are
>     concerned.  Additionally there have been some requests for a separate
>     "push" module which won't need the full aerogear android library.
>
>     The full modularization of the library along with several other
>     improvements is scheduled for the "2.0" epic.
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDROID-236 mentions fix version : 1.4
> , should that be updated ?
>
>
>     So my question is a) Should we make a 2.0 which is only the
>     modularization sooner and iterate on that a few times before we
>     include
>     our improvements in a 3.0 or b) Should we create a "fork" project
>     which
>     is only a push module?  This new project will get merged back into the
>     main project when we have our complete modularizations.
>
>
>
>     --
>     Summers Pittman
>     >>Phone:404 941 4698 <tel:404%20941%204698>
>     >>Java is my crack.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     aerogear-dev mailing list
>     aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Updated.

--
Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java is my crack.



More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list