[aerogear-dev] Modularization and Push
Summers Pittman
supittma at redhat.com
Mon Mar 31 10:06:42 EDT 2014
On Mon 31 Mar 2014 10:05:05 AM EDT, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com
> <mailto:supittma at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Y'all,
>
> So there has been some concerns with the complexity of the build
> especially where including the Google GCM (push) libraries are
> concerned. Additionally there have been some requests for a separate
> "push" module which won't need the full aerogear android library.
>
> The full modularization of the library along with several other
> improvements is scheduled for the "2.0" epic.
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDROID-236 mentions fix version : 1.4
> , should that be updated ?
>
>
> So my question is a) Should we make a 2.0 which is only the
> modularization sooner and iterate on that a few times before we
> include
> our improvements in a 3.0 or b) Should we create a "fork" project
> which
> is only a push module? This new project will get merged back into the
> main project when we have our complete modularizations.
>
>
>
> --
> Summers Pittman
> >>Phone:404 941 4698 <tel:404%20941%204698>
> >>Java is my crack.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Updated.
--
Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java is my crack.
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list