[aerogear-dev] Modularization and Push

Karel Piwko kpiwko at redhat.com
Mon Mar 31 11:07:03 EDT 2014


I'd prefer a) unless you plan to regularly release milestones of b) into Maven
Central. Relying on snapshots in demos and tests is a PITA. And this looks like
a lot of effort, so branch might be living its own life for a very long time.

Karel

On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:58:57 -0400
Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:

> Y'all,
> 
> So there has been some concerns with the complexity of the build 
> especially where including the Google GCM (push) libraries are 
> concerned.  Additionally there have been some requests for a separate 
> "push" module which won't need the full aerogear android library.
> 
> The full modularization of the library along with several other 
> improvements is scheduled for the "2.0" epic.
> 
> So my question is a) Should we make a 2.0 which is only the 
> modularization sooner and iterate on that a few times before we include 
> our improvements in a 3.0 or b) Should we create a "fork" project which 
> is only a push module?  This new project will get merged back into the 
> main project when we have our complete modularizations.
> 
> 
> 



More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list