[aerogear-dev] Keycloak user/roles management

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Hello,

yes - the handling is done by Keycloak itself; Last time we looked at user
management, we had the following in terms of roles:

https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605

Not sure the names of these roles are great.... let's see

Basically I think the role definition in the gist still addresses most of
what we want to archive:
* super-user: in charge of managing the UPS realm (including users); can
see _ALL_ push applications  (that's the admin in Sebi's gist)
* PushAdmin: Someone that can manage applications and variants, but is not
able to add new users; he also sees only his applications/variants etc
(that's the developer in sebis gist)

The gist also contains a 'Viewer' role - At this point I am not sure we do
really need this. My impression is that if we have PushAdmins for our 1.0.0
community release that will be enough.

-Matthias




On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>wrote:

> Good morning peeps,
>
> Before I jump in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-639. I would
> like to understand what do you guys want say with this issue.
>
> Currently Keycloak already has its own user/roles managements. What do
> you guys are looking for? Any specific requirements?
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140521/d021d3ca/attachment.html