[aerogear-dev] Proposal to change the Java Sender Builder API

Corinne Krych corinnekrych at gmail.com
Mon Nov 10 02:51:55 EST 2014


+1 too
also I like the idea of dropping "Java" in JavaSender for a more
descriptive PushSender or PushAppSender to get the information this sender
is linked to an Push app

++
Corinne

On 10 November 2014 08:31, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 I like the static methods for creating the builder
> Also makes perfect sense to make the applicationId and masterSecret part
> of the sender.
>
>
> PushSender client = DefaultPushSender.withRootServerURL("
> http://aerogear.example.com/ag-push")
>                 .proxy("proxy", 8080)
>                 .proxyType(Proxy.Type.HTTP)
>                 .build();
> PushSender client =
> DefaultPushSender.withConfig("/path/on/classpath/push-config.json").build();
> PushSender client = DefaultPushSender.withConfig(inputstream).build();
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141110/6b4960ab/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list