[aerogear-dev] [datasync] JIRA component name

[Matthias Wessendorf]

instead of storing all sync items underneath the AEROGEAR instance, we
could have a AGDATASYNC JIRA instance. I think this makes it nicer to
organize, especially with releases. That's what we did with AGPUSH for the
'push feature', which obviously is available across platforms.

-Matthias

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> we have created JIRA tasks for the data sync roadmaps [1][2].
>
> While creating them we noticed that we are using different component names
> in JIRA for the our projects:
>
> AEROGEAR:
> Uses 'data-sync' as the component name:
> https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322676
>
> AGIOS
> Uses 'sync' as the component name:
> https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322678
>
> AGDROID
> Uses 'datasync' as the component name:
> https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322677
>
> AGJS
> Uses 'data-sync' as the component name:
> https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322679
>
> I would be nice to makes these consistent across the projects. Let me know
> which you prefer and I'll make the changes needed.
>
> I'm personally +1 for 'datasync'
>
> [1] http://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearDataSync
> [2] http://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearConflictResolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141111/1ec50a8c/attachment.html