[aerogear-dev] UPS server configuration interface?

Lukáš Fryč lukas.fryc at gmail.com
Wed Nov 19 08:21:36 EST 2014


Yep, that sounds good,

the configuration screen can be called out from Menu directly (alongside
Account Management and Log out options)?

I guess a submenu (Configuration > Keycloak) or a screen with a link to the
Keycloak configuration would be a best fit.

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
wrote:

> Morning my friend, I added a description with some simple rules at
> AGPUSH-1111. Quoting here for discussion:
>
> To decouple UPS from Keycloak in separated servers a configuration
> interface must be built to generate the appropriate JSON file on the
> fly, during the configuration.
>
> Some rules must be respected:
>
> - First time configuration
>
> If the configuration is the first time, just prompt user with the
> configuration interface built buy Andres Galante.
>
> - After the URL configuration
>
> If the configuration was already provided and the admin must change it,
> he must be logged in to change. Otherwise, change to other Keycloak
> server won't be allowed
>
> Does it make any sense for you?
>
>
> On 2014-11-19, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
> > One more question to configuration screen (as I'm not aware it was
> > discussed yet),
> >
> > do we allow users to reconfigure Keycloak instance once it is already in
> > use via the configuration screen?
> >
> > This would be handy if someone installs UPS with defaults and later
> decides
> > to use standalone Keycloak.
> >
> >
> > This would make the things messy /wrt evidence of who created what
> > application, but maybe a warning that this information will be lost
> should
> > be okay?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Help is always welcome. Feel free to create sub-tasks here: AGPUSH-1047
> > >
> > > Thank you Lukas.
> > >
> > > On 2014-11-18, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
> > > > This seems that makes for pretty good User Experience...
> > > >
> > > > What about "Built-in" Keycloak instead of Default?
> > > > I guess "Keycloak URL" will disappear when "Built-in" is chosen,
> right?
> > > >
> > > > Let me know, Brno, if you would appreciate help with prototyping
> that UI.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Sebastien Blanc <
> scm.blanc at gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Bruno Oliveira <
> bruno at abstractj.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Question: What would be the best for you generate an
> ups-realm.json
> > > file
> > > > >> for download based on the current host or let the developer
> specify
> > > the
> > > > >> redirect URL?
> > > > >>
> > > > > I would say, let's use the current host, like we do when we
> generate
> > > the
> > > > > code snippets examples.
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm thinking about it
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > >
> https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/db7639566e75f01a8cc79ff18f22daa61cc9cb30#diff-b8df82f22499b0118c37e0e363c4342aR80
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2014-11-17, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > matzew at apache.org
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Bruno Oliveira <
> > > bruno at abstractj.org>
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> Good morning amazing people.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> While working on AGPUSH-1047, I was wondering if would make
> > > sense on
> > > > >> > >> having a configuration page before users getting started.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > you speak out of my mind, I thought about the same in the
> train,
> > > when
> > > > >> I
> > > > >> > > saw you changes on GH (the URL replacements to KC and KC.js).
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > We somehow should have a dialog right after installation, that
> > > asks
> > > > >> > > "default" or "custom" KC server etc
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > where
> > > > >> > * default would be -> KC and UPS on same server;
> > > > >> > custom: Provide URL for KC server
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> I thinking about the current problem on decoupling our server
> > > from
> > > > >> > >> Keycloak[1] and OpenShift.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> What is the current proposal for the initial setup?
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> 1. Developer create an UPS instance on OpenShift
> > > > >> > >> 2. Visit https://myups-abstractj.rhcloud.com/ag-push
> > > > >> > >> 3. The application automagically redirect to the
> configuration
> > > page
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> > >> options to skip or enter the URL for the Keycloak server.
> > > > >> > >> 4. App changes the keycloak.json/ups-realm.json file based on
> > > the URL
> > > > >> > >> provided.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> Does it make sense?
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > yes, it absolutely does!
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> [1] -
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >>
> > >
> https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/db7639566e75f01a8cc79ff18f22daa61cc9cb30#diff-f2f2799554171f7ce321785716b71244R3
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> --
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> abstractj
> > > > >> > >> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > > > >> > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > >> > >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > >> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > >> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > >> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > > >> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > >> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> abstractj
> > > > >> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > abstractj
> > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141119/11a5ecb2/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list