[aerogear-dev] Admin endpoints

Bruno Oliveira bruno at abstractj.org
Fri Oct 10 09:36:23 EDT 2014


I really want to confirm this. So this is what you guys want:

- https://gist.github.com/abstractj/3873482db8f4535aefe0#file-pushapplicationendpoint-java-L109
- https://gist.github.com/abstractj/3873482db8f4535aefe0#file-pushapplicationendpoint-java-L132
- https://gist.github.com/abstractj/3873482db8f4535aefe0#file-pushapplicationendpoint-java-L172
- https://gist.github.com/abstractj/3873482db8f4535aefe0#file-pushapplicationendpoint-java-L199

And with more methods we add more IFs, right?

On 2014-10-10, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2014-10-09, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Sébastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Another option could be :
> > > > - no change or addition of any endpoint
> > > > -no change on the angular side
> > > >
> > > > Since the result is the same : we want a list of applications (for
> > admin
> > > > there is just no restriction on developer that owns it)
> > > > But in the service layer when retrieving the applications we check the
> > > > role (do we have a method hasRole(string) ? ) to see if we add the
> > criteria
> > > > of developer.
> > > >
> > >
> > > yeah, that;s what I had in my email from last night as well. the service
> > > returns a list of applications.
> >
> > I think this is very clear to everyone and the basic principle of this
> > jira.
> >
> > > Inside we handle the different cases:
> > > - admin
> > >    Select all (e.g. "select pa from PushApplication pa")
> > > -developer
> > >    select 'my apps' (e.g. "select pa from PushApplication pa where
> > > pa.developer = :loginName")
> >
> > This is the recommendation from KC documentation
> >
> > http://docs.jboss.org/keycloak/docs/1.0.2.Final/userguide/html/ch07.html#d4e611
> > .
> >
>
> I understand their example, but we don't really (within UPS) have a
> completely different UI between "admin" and "developer" roles.
>
>
> >
> > So what do you guys suggest is: If I have several methods to validate
> > multiple roles, just add if/else all along the UPS code? And if I have a
> > new
> > role, include more ifs?
> >
> > I think it can be done inject the SecurityContext, have to check with
> > Stian and Bill. But it doesn't seem right.
> >
>
> might not be the most elegant, but looks like it avoids adding too much new
> code. Especially since the UI for 'admin' and 'developer' is pretty much
> the same.
>
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Envoyé de mon iPhone
> > > >
> > > > > Le 9 oct. 2014 à 17:45, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> a
> > écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > > Good morning, moving forward with
> > > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1036. What is the most
> > > > > recommended approach for admin-ui.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have separated endpoints for the admin like:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1.
> > > > >
> > > > > @RolesAllowed("admin")
> > > > > @Path("/admin/applications")
> > > > > public class AdminApplicationEndpoint extends AbstractBaseEndpoint {
> > > > >
> > > > >    @GET
> > > > >    @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
> > > > >    public Response listAllPushApplications(){
> > > > >        //queries
> > > > >    }
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > Or introduce a new method inside the current PushApplicationEndpoint:
> > > > >
> > > > > 2.
> > > > >
> > > > >    @GET
> > > > >    @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
> > > > >    @RolesAllowed("admin")
> > > > >    public Response listAllPushApplications(){
> > > > >      //queries
> > > > >    }
> > > > >    // READ
> > > > >    @GET
> > > > >    @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
> > > > >    public Response listAllPushApplicationsByUsername(@Context
> > > > HttpServletRequest request) {
> > > > >        return
> > > >
> > Response.ok(pushAppService.findAllPushApplicationsForDeveloper(extractUsername(request))).build();
> > > > >    }
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If the option 2 is the correct. How the Angular.js service would look
> > > > > like? Once the username is not informed as argument on
> > > > > pushApplicationService.js, because for obvious reasons it can be
> > > > > retrieved with HttpServletRequest.
> > > > >
> > > > > One of my poor ideas due to my "amazing" Angular skills would be to
> > do
> > > > > something like:
> > > > >
> > > > >    @GET
> > > > >    @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
> > > > >    @RolesAllowed("admin")
> > > > >    @Path("/all")
> > > > >    public Response listAllPushApplications(){
> > > > >      //queries
> > > > >    }
> > > > >
> > > > > And:
> > > > >
> > > > > backendMod.factory('pushApplication', function ($resource) {
> > > > >  return $resource('rest/applications/all/:verb', {
> > > > > .....
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Help?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > abstractj
> > > > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list