[aerogear-dev] Using existing Keycloak installation with Aerogear

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Hi,

for the UnifiedPush Server the initial integration case was to function
only for the need of the AeroGear UnifiedPush server.

So, looks like, you'd appreciate a bit more flexibility, to basically use
the auth-server for other apps as well ?



On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:18 PM, ekolesnikov <ek at fastlane-it.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Apologies for writing straight into DEV forums - I was unable to locate
> "aerogear-users" mailing list anywhere. Please feel free to point me to the
> right direction if this mailing list is inappropriate for questions like
> this.
>
> Is it possible to use/integrate Aerogear with existing Keycloak
> installation? We are already using Keycloak for all things auth in our
> application and have found ourselves in the situation where we potentially
> have to manage separate infrastructure - which makes the whole point of
> using Keycloak a bit irrelevant.
>
> As an alternative, we could consider using Keycloak supplied with with
> Aerogear - unfortunately, it looks like Aerogear has disabled Keycloak
> option to create additional realms.
>
> I would really appreciate it if you could share your thought on this.
>
> Thanks
> Egor
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/Using-existing-Keycloak-installation-with-Aerogear-tp9440.html
> Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141013/41e30538/attachment.html