[aerogear-dev] message format change proposal

[Erik Jan de Wit]

> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> 'payload' is the term used for this kind of "in-message custom data"
> since the early years of EIP tools (before camel was born)
> 
> nested payload, inside of message, I am not sure
> 

Thinking a bit more about it, I don’t like data (it’s to generic everything is data) and I don’t like payload either (because everything is message payload) can’t we use something like ‘customData’ , ‘userData’, `userKeys` or perhaps something that says a little bit more to what this is.

>  
> 
> Any strong reason to avoid it?

yeah, let’s keep the once that are there because the are consistent with apple
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141027/1ce9c532/attachment.html