[aerogear-dev] message format change proposal

Douglas Campos qmx at qmx.me
Mon Oct 27 12:50:28 EDT 2014


On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:30:51PM +0100, Erik Jan de Wit wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> > 'payload' is the term used for this kind of "in-message custom data"
> > since the early years of EIP tools (before camel was born)
> > 
> > nested payload, inside of message, I am not sure
> > 
> 
> Thinking a bit more about it, I don’t like data (it’s to generic
> everything is data) and I don’t like payload either (because
> everything is message payload) can’t we use something like
> ‘customData’ , ‘userData’, `userKeys` or perhaps something that says a
> little bit more to what this is.
+1 to userData, clearly communicates intent (if y'all dislike payload) :D

-- 
qmx


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list