[aerogear-dev] message format change proposal

[Daniel Passos]

-1 to payload, +1 to user-data || userData

-- Passos

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:30:51PM +0100, Erik Jan de Wit wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>> > > 'payload' is the term used for this kind of "in-message custom data"
>> > > since the early years of EIP tools (before camel was born)
>> > >
>> > > nested payload, inside of message, I am not sure
>> > >
>> >
>> > Thinking a bit more about it, I don’t like data (it’s to generic
>> > everything is data) and I don’t like payload either (because
>> > everything is message payload) can’t we use something like
>> > ‘customData’ , ‘userData’, `userKeys` or perhaps something that says a
>> > little bit more to what this is.
>> +1 to userData, clearly communicates intent (if y'all dislike payload) :D
>>
>
> how about user-data  ?
> (due to consistency ?) :)
>
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141027/6403e6f2/attachment.html