[aerogear-dev] Should Cordova push plugin dependencies be shrinkwrapped?

Karel Piwko kpiwko at redhat.com
Mon Sep 8 08:17:05 EDT 2014


+1, we were hardcoding versions in UPS and this change in Cordova plugin
has slipped of QE eyes.

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 18:33 +0200, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
> +1 it should definitely point to the specific version
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi All,
> > I have been working cordova push quickstarts and noticed that on Android
> > installation through JBoss tools started to fail.
> >
> > After a  bit of investigation  I figured that the failure occurs because
> > push plugin defines cordova plugin "com.google.playservices" as a
> > dependency through a git URL[1] that points to the master of the plugin's
> > repo. Unfortunately this repo received a change [2] which started to use a
> > new feature that was not implemented for JBoss tools. In this particular
> > case, I am already implementing the missing feature so it should be all
> > good soon. However I have doubts that referencing a dependency through
> > master is a good idea. I think it may not only make it really difficult for
> > us to reproduce cases but also unexpected behaviour may just appear.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/MobileChromeApps/google-play-services
> > [2]
> > https://github.com/MobileChromeApps/google-play-services/commit/41c19152c21981c9a2f6497cc2100c317f5c660d
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list