[aerogear-dev] In which version include Data Sync? 2.0 or 1.x?

[Daniel Passos]

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Friday, September 19, 2014 1:50:33 PM, Daniel Passos wrote:
>
>> Summers you're never wrong :)
>>
>> BTW, I'm not sure about 2.0 or 2.1, we are in the middle of a BIG
>> refactoring for 2.0
>>
>
> Can we make a areogear-android-datasync:0.1 then?
>

Sure


-- Passos
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com
>> <mailto:supittma at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 9/19/2014 7:25 AM, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
>>
>>>     Hey guys,
>>>
>>>     on yesterday's Aerogear.js meeting we have discussed in which
>>>     version we should include Data Sync module. Since we are starting
>>>     works on ES6 compatibility, which is one of the big features for
>>>     2.0, it make sense to continue with Data Sync there.
>>>
>>>     What about Android and iOS SDKs? Do you plan to include new
>>>     module in 2.0 or start that in 1.x and later backport to 2.0?
>>>
>>     It will be part of 2.0.  We don't have any plans to back port this
>>     to the 1.x branches of things.
>>     Passos, feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Cheers!
>>>
>>>     ~ Lukas
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140922/3318eb36/attachment.html