[aerogear-dev] UPS: initial JMS support landed (on master)

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Wed Apr 22 12:20:10 EDT 2015


Thanks Erik, I saw your PR against my branch - will give it a shot 2nite

-M

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:

> It must be something simple, can't believe it has anything to do with
> sequence being created wrong, because that would create duplicate
> keys, so the error would be different. DBUnit is not specific to Derby
> we can use other databases as well.
>
> Adding a whole lot of code in each test just to setup the database
> with data to test is in my opinion is not a nice thing to do, because
> it obscures the test.
>
> Let me have another crack at this, I could also try and use mysql as
> testdb making the tests even more valuable
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
> > or, instead of java having a .sql script for that test data creation
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Looks like some odd things are going on here, w/ Sequences and
> Derby.... I
> >> have no clue - anyone else?
> >>
> >> I tried other DBs (e.g. H2 or MySQL), but DBUnit is .... somewhat
> specific
> >> to Derby. Which is not great :-(
> >>
> >> I move the migration merge to master to beta.1.  I am wondering if we
> >> really should do DBUnit w/ tests against Derby... especially since we
> only
> >> really support MySQL/Postgres.
> >>
> >> I think what we should to is: get rid of DBUnit and use Java to create
> the
> >> test data. Use Docker (once fully supported on Travis) and fire up
> Postgres
> >> and MySQL during the tests.
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> as a FYI, the master branch now contains initial JMS support. That also
> >>> means we require WF/EAP running as full profile, as stated in the
> updated
> >>> README:
> >>>
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server#getting-started
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> For the 1.1.0.Final release there will be a few more JMS based
> >>> enhancements, as we go:
> >>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1321
> >>>
> >>> -Matthias
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>
> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>        Erik Jan
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150422/519e0ea7/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list