[aerogear-dev] Breaking changes in between UPS 1.1.0.Beta3 and 1.1.0.Final

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:

> Thanks Matthias,
>
> Comments inline.
>
> Karel
>
> Dne 17. 8. 2015 11:54 napsal uživatel "Matthias Wessendorf" <
> matzew at apache.org>:
> >
> > Hi Karel,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> I'm really unhappy with number of breaking changes that has appeared in
> the latest staged 1.1.0.Final - mostly these changes were related to
> massive DB schema updates. I'd expect such changes to happen in Alpha phase
> and not in between Beta3 and Final.
> >
> >
> > I fully understand your frustration. I think the source of this issue is
> that the migration work took much longer than expected, getting it ported
> to master branch (was introduced on 1.0.3).
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I understand that a lot of these changes have been driven by late
> inclusion of migrator to 1.1 branch. That said, what is the plan with
> 1.1.0.Final? Are you guys going to remove the changes or at least make sure
> they do not impact users running Beta3?
> >
> >
> > I think the biggest concern is clearly supporting users, upgrading from
> 1.0.3
> >
> >>
> >> I've seen it has been de-staged and there have been a few commits
> reverting DB changes back. Is there any estimate when 1.1.0.Final will be
> restaged?
> >
> >
> > Yeah, there will be a re-staging coming soon. Question, due to the huge
> changes, what about doing a Beta.4 and following up w a .Final in week or
> two?
> > To make sure things are stable, before we stage a 1.1.0.Final - makes
> sense ?
>
> Sounds good to me!
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> QE plan is to make sure that migration from 1.0.3 is smooth, however we
> also want migration from Beta3 to be smooth.
> >
> >
> > I am actually over asked about the migration from beta.3, not sure
> that's really a huge concern here
>
> If that's not required, we can obviously skip such testing.
>

yeah, sounds good to me!

Ok, Karel, again, I understand the pain, and I will do a beta.4 staging
later this evening!


>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >>
> >> Karel
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150817/4d4fc9d2/attachment.html