[aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush js client

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Mon Aug 31 12:01:02 EDT 2015


sure, let's do it - makes it obvious something changed

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:

> The new Repo is now here https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js-push !!
>
> I'll create some JIRA's to update the Readme, update aerogear.org, remove
> the code from the main repo, etc...
>
>
> Question.  Will this require a major version bump once i remove the code?
>  i'm thinking yes
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> This way, we're getting closer to native libs approach with separate libs
>>
>> On 31 August 2015 at 10:55, Lukáš Fryč <lukas at fryc.eu> wrote:
>>
>>> You are right Luke, this start to make more and more sense :-)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> so i decided to take a gander at the push client lib in the aerogear.js
>>>> project.   Currently if someone would like to use it,  they have a couple
>>>> options.
>>>>
>>>> 1. download the whole lib,
>>>> 2. download a custom build from the website
>>>> 3. download a custom build from bower
>>>> 4. create a custom build from source
>>>>
>>>> In the past i think i was against breaking out pieces of the JS lib
>>>> into separate repo's since we could just use the AeroGearComponents repo i
>>>> created for custom builds.  But i think with the state of the JS lib(not
>>>> sure where it's going), it might make sense to, at least with the push
>>>> lib(perhaps the simplePush polyfill also) to break those out into separate
>>>> repo's similar to the other client projects.
>>>>
>>>> I think the starting vision of the project has changed, so perhaps this
>>>> change is good.(this should probably be a whole separate thread)
>>>>
>>>> Now that Chrome and Safari have push in the browser, FF is getting it
>>>> also very soon,  it's possible this part of the library will be used more
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -Luke
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150831/96a8fcb2/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list