[aerogear-dev] Worth to update Node.js build for UPS Admin?

Luke Holmquist lholmqui at redhat.com
Tue Dec 1 09:22:28 EST 2015


ok,  i'll check this out.

looks like it is failing during minification

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Lukas Fryc <lfryc at redhat.com> wrote:

> Right, good to know the impact beforehand.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> sure,
>>
>> I was never saying it's a must - I was just evaluating if that's an
>> option. Currently all works, but I fear that if we (for what ever reason)
>> have to update a dependency, they won't support 0.10.x anymore :-)
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Lukas Fryc <lfryc at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It is definitely nice to have it upgraded (nothing urgent though),
>>>
>>> I would put some Component Upgrade issue down, and identify scope first.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> also reply !== volunteering  :) :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> probably would be a good idea to try and update to the latest
>>>>> version.  JIRA? :)
>>>>>
>>>>> without looking at the dependencies, i'd imagine that some of them
>>>>> need updating since there were breaking changes going from 0.10 to 0.12
>>>>>
>>>>> any stack trace for the error.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>>>> matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was wondering if it makes sense to update the Node based build for
>>>>>> the Admin UI of the UPS to use a slightly newer version of Node.js
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently we are using v0.10.31:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/admin-ui/pom.xml#L60
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I changed that line to v5.1.0 and, to be honest, as expected, it did
>>>>>> not work :-) But, surprisingly an update to something lower (e.g. 0.12.8)
>>>>>> did also not work :-(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That actually made we wonder if this might become a problem, sooner
>>>>>> or later, and if we should be updating the build to use a more modern
>>>>>> Node/NPM version for our build?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any thoughts (or volunteers :-))
>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lukáš Fryč
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat Mobile | AeroGear.org, FeedHenry.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lukáš Fryč
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat Mobile | AeroGear.org, FeedHenry.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20151201/378d95f5/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list