[aerogear-dev] Amazon Push SDK and Android Push SDK

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Tue Feb 3 14:43:42 EST 2015


Good catch, Summers!

Let me follow up on that!

On Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:

>  On 02/03/2015 10:45 AM, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>
> About Licence of their SDK :
> https://developer.amazon.com/appsandservices/support/pml.html
> " you will not (a) incorporate or compile any portion of the Program
> Materials into your own programs or any other software, (b) distribute,
> sub-license or otherwise provide any portion of the Program Materials to
> any third party, or (c) modify or create derivative works of the Program
> Materials."
> ...
>
> May actually be a good point.  Their license also explicitly calls out
> that software made with the SDK should be intended for distribution in
> Amazon's App Store.
>
> " You may use Program Materials only in connection with Your Products
> intended for distribution through the Distribution Program, unless the
> documentation for the applicable Program Materials authorizes broader use. "
>
> I think we might need to summon a lawyer on this one.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','scm.blanc at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','supittma at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>>  On 02/03/2015 09:56 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','scm.blanc at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good Morning all !
>>>>
>>>>  As you might know, we are currently adding Amazon Device Messaging
>>>> support to the UnifiedPush server.
>>>> The server side has been PRed and it's now time to work on the client
>>>> SDK.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  once our java-adm is on maven central, I will take a look at the PR
>>>
>>>
>>>>  As you probably know, the amazon devices :  the Kindle Fire (2nd and
>>>> third generation), Fire Phone and FireTV are running FireOS which is
>>>> basically a fork of Android OS. And since we have an Android Push SDK I
>>>> start looking if we could reuse it.
>>>>
>>>>  First good news, is that since AGDroid 2.0, things has been nicely
>>>> isolated and is open for extension. But there is still some refactoring to
>>>> do, the "UPS Registration" flow/logic is still in the "gcm" package[1].
>>>>
>>>
>>>  the package name shouldn't be the smallest concern :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>  That logic should be moved one package level higher in a new Abstract
>>>> class.
>>>> In the end we will have a "gcm" package and a "adm" package (or
>>>> project, see later in my questions)
>>>>
>>>
>>>  +1
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  This way the ADM logic would be able to reuse that registration code.
>>>> I started to play a bit with this refactoring here[2], disclaimer here, I'm
>>>> not even sure that this code compiles, is just to give an idea.
>>>>
>>>>  So before I go further,  some questions (mainly for our Android Gods
>>>> ;)  ) :
>>>>
>>>>  - Is this a good idea (reusing your SDK) ? I think yes, even if there
>>>> is some time and effort needed for refactoring to make it completly generic.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  sounds reasonable to me, to extend it and apply changes on a separate
>>> ADM-PUSH-SDK
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  - How do we build / package / deliver ?
>>>>
>>>
>>>  gradle? or, what does Amazon do / prefer ?
>>>
>>>
>>>>  We probably want 2 distinct JAR/aar. We could use profile in Maven to
>>>> only package one feature but that sounds a bit "messy".
>>>> What about having sub-projects, this way we would have
>>>> aerogear-android-push and then : aerogear-android-push-gcm and
>>>> aerogear-push-gcm.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  Not sure I get that, but do you mean "aerogear-android-push"
>>> - aerogear-android-push-gcm
>>> - aerogear-android-push-adm
>>>
>>>  sounds reasonable
>>>
>>>  No it isn't.  For starters it will break the 2.0 API and require a 3.0
>>> API release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  - The registration flow for ADM[3] (so device <-> Amazon's server) is
>>>> a bit different thant the GCM one
>>>> , it's the same interface that receive the registration event and the
>>>> push notification events. We have to check how this fit with the current
>>>> architecture of android-push.
>>>>
>>>>  Other challenge will be shipping ADM jar, since this one is on Maven
>>>> and must be downloaded manually but that is for later ;)
>>>>
>>>
>>>  not sure, why do we need to ship it? what's the license? Why do I need
>>> a manual download from maven ? Not following here
>>>
>>>  Amazon's SDK is a giant zip bundle.  We will need to find a way to
>>> package it into the local maven repo.
>>>
>>   Yeah it's a nightmare. You can get this ZIP only from their
>> developer's portal. Once unzipped, you have to dig some folder before
>> finding the ADM jar (the only one that we need)
>>
>>>
>>> They do publish some things to central, but it looks like that is their
>>> AWS APIs but not ADM.
>>>
>>  Yep, I checked as well and it's only for AWS stuff :(
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Sebi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  [1]
>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-android-push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/android/unifiedpush/gcm/AeroGearGCMPushRegistrar.java
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://github.com/sebastienblanc/aerogear-android-push/tree/refactoring
>>>> [3]
>>>> https://developer.amazon.com/public/apis/engage/device-messaging/tech-docs/04-integrating-your-app-with-adm
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Summers Pittman
>>> >>Phone:404 941 4698
>>> >>Java is my crack.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Summers Pittman
> >>Phone:404 941 4698
> >>Java is my crack.
>
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150203/ebd9f6c9/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list