[aerogear-dev] USP 1.1.0 - API change: Status code change for Sender Endpoint

Summers Pittman supittma at redhat.com
Wed Feb 4 09:56:51 EST 2015


On 02/03/2015 04:13 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently noticed that we are (IMO) incorrectly returning 200 (OK):
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/jaxrs/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/rest/sender/PushNotificationSenderEndpoint.java#L112-L113
>
> Since we really do submit an async job here, and its processing may 
> not have been started when we do return the 200 (OK), I'd like to 
> propose a slight change here to instead use 202 (Accepted):
>
> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.2.3
>
> If the team is OK (ha ha) with this, I will track this in JIRA
This should be OK, I will need to review the Android code.

Is there any downside to accepting results on the client side? (As 
opposed to configuring the library comply with a certain version of UPS)

>
> -Matthias
>
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


-- 
Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java is my crack.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150204/8b636f79/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list