[aerogear-dev] UP console questions

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Tue Jan 6 09:47:34 EST 2015


On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com> wrote:

> Matthias, I was trying to show how GH handles screens when they are empty,
> it doesn't matter its NO notifications or NO variants or NO apps. The idea
> is what to show when there ir nothing to show :)
>
> Patternfly doesn't have a pattern for blank slates, so we are discussing
> with the UX team how to show them on our consoles. It will probably follow
> what we do on our console.
>

+1 sounds good, integrating this theme into patternfly


>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org>
> To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:22:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UP console questions
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Andres Galante < agalante at redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Matthias and Daniel. This really helps.
>
> Matthias we do need to be more explicit along the way.
> For first time users we need a blank slate[1] followed by a wizard. Plus
> blank slate for each empty page (like no variants). We can't assume that
> everyone will read the documentation first.
>
> the notifications from GH are just an example here, right? And we would
> need this being applied to Push Apps and Variants, right?
> Because it's not the intention of the UPS console to actually read the
> notifcations. Sure the dashboard shows them and info, but thats more
> monitoring (e.g. did something go wrong while delivering to
> Apple/Google/Microsoft)
>
>
> Apart from that we need to guide users as they set up backend and device
> configuration.
>
> yeah, we had previously thought about a better integration of our doc. The
> doc for the UPS is here:
> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/
>
>
>
> I am working on all this and rearranging IA so it makes more sense.
>
> [1] https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4371641/blank.jpg
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" < matzew at apache.org >
> To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" < aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >
> Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 8:55:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UP console questions
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Daniel Passos < daniel at passos.me > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew at apache.org >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Andres Galante < agalante at redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
> Hey!
>
> I am working on the push console, and I have some questions:
>
> 1- What is the main action on the console? What is the main goal a user
> want to achieve?
> I notice that the console is center on creating and seeing up apps and not
> so much in sending notifications. Is sending notifications usually done on
> code and not the console?
>
> the console is nice to send test messages. But in reality a backend (e.g.
> a MBaaS) will send a request to UPS to force it to deliver the push to
> Apple and GCM.
>
> The main goal is managaement (and overview/stats) around Apps, their
> Variants and their installations.
>
>
>
> 2- Under each app we have some information mixed with actions:
> No variants - Activity - Send Push - admin
> What does "admin" do, can an app be manage by other thats not the admin?
>
> we allow to roles:
> * admin
> * user
> a user (like Andres or Matthias) can do all the CRUD actions. Andres see
> his apps, Matthias see his own apps too. An Admin (e.g. Jay) sees apps from
> both users Andres and Matthias
>
>
>
>
> 3- Once you click on an app name you get a yellow box with "Sending push
> notifications" set up information. But when you create a variant you also
> get an specific info box for each variant.
> What is the difference between them?
>
> not sure what you are asking
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The first box ( Sending push notifications ) when you create a new
> application is a snippet of code to you use in you backend (using our
> sender API[1]) to send a message to UPS and it delivery to the devices like
> it[2]. The second box ( Registering installations ) when you create a
> variant is a snippet of code to you use in you mobile app to register you
> device in that application like it[3]
>
> Ah, ok. I now think that the provide text/headers and icons for the two
> different boxes are perhaps not good enough. Andres, would it make sense to
> be more explicit there? I think some of what passos wrote could be perhaps
> baked into the boxes, right ?
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/GetStartedwithJavaSender/
> [2]
> https://github.com/danielpassos/aerogear-jaxrs-backend/blob/master/src/main/java/me/passos/talks/aerogear/ProductService.java#L56-L69
> [3]
> https://github.com/danielpassos/AeroProduct/blob/master/src/me/passos/talks/aerogear/AeroProductsApplication.java#L36-L60
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150106/4bb74423/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list