[aerogear-dev] better windows push notification support

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
wrote:

> We had similar discussion in this previous thread [1]
> If we go platform specific section, there are also some iOS only fields
> (for interactive notification, silent one) that should go in ios section.
>

yeah, that's probably true.
However, I always liked the unified API, making it somewhat simple to reach
a lot of platforms with a simple request to the UPS. If we add more and
more nested objects (e.g. android, windows, ios), it can go wild, pretty
easy.

Perhaps for more complex messages, this might be needed :-/





>
> ++
> Corinne
> [1]
> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-message-format-change-proposal-td8977.html
>
> > On 08 Jan 2015, at 16:17, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> We would need to setup a backward-compatibility layer and thus
> >> cluttering code. The benefit is a clean API though.
> >>
> > This is not an issue as we have a filter in place that converts from the
> > old api to the new one.
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150109/7687bbbe/attachment-0001.html