[aerogear-dev] UPS: Console - Visibility issues

[Andres Galante]

Good idea Sebastien! That is a good placement. I'll test it and see if we
need a line or something to mark a separation between them and the network
info.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I would vote to have them along with the other variant details that are
> already shown (like google's project number etc ...)
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Matthias and Lukas,
>>>
>>> During the user research time I've learn that there are almost none use
>>> case where the user uses this information stand alone. The user would just
>>> copy and paste the code snippet.
>>>
>>
>> well, that does not always work (e.g. sligthly different structure of
>> code).
>> Even our own Android HelloWorld Demo is not able to use the snippets and
>> paste them in (due to different code structure - which is good).
>>
>> Having them visible give a bit more appreciation to these IDs (or call em
>> API keys), so it's easy to get the desired info quickly
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> We use it a lot because we test it and set it up a bunch of times UPS.
>>> We already have the code set up and we end up knowing where to look for the
>>> data. Luke bring this same issue to me during Summit.
>>>
>>> Let me think of a good way to highlight that information to make the
>>> expert user life easier.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas at fryc.eu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Basically it is something that we "agreed on" (or rather didn't catch)
>>>> during mockup reviews and that never changed from that time.
>>>>
>>>> @Andres: did it have some reason to hide the details?
>>>>
>>>> I'm all for exposing it more visibly.
>>>>
>>>> st 24. 6. 2015 v 17:21 odesílatel Matthias Wessendorf <
>>>> matzew at apache.org> napsal:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> on our old design the PushApplicationID/MasterSecret was very good to
>>>>> notice:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant.png
>>>>>
>>>>> Now it's a bit more hidden (one has to click on the "Sender API" tab
>>>>> of the Application).
>>>>>
>>>>> Similar w/ the VariantID/Secret pair, IMO it is also a bit hidden,
>>>>> since this is only visible in the source snippets for the variant.
>>>>>
>>>>> They used to be a bit more present:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant_details.png
>>>>>
>>>>> Since I find that suboptimal, I am wondering if that's done for a good
>>>>> reason, or if something (in a future version?) should be changed ?
>>>>>
>>>>> -M
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150629/08a45a3a/attachment-0001.html