[aerogear-dev] Dealing with UPS Keycloak data post-datasource-split

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Doug,
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> back to one schema, for 1.1.0 and do clean separation on 1.2.0?
>>>
>>
>> Worksforme(tm)
>>
>> +1
>>
>
> ok, cool - I'd say - let's do that.
>
> So, since the KC part (e.g. new Keycloak versions), is covered by
> themselves, something like this [1] is not a huge issue, right? At least
> that's my understanding/assumption.
>

FYI - the KC version on master is now on 1.2.0.CR1 - but incase this has
_negative_ effect for your migration work, please let us know. I think
going back to an older version of KC is not a show stopper at all

-M

>
> Related, we already have a vage epic to cover the separation, I have moved
> that to 1.2.0
>
> [1] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/547
> [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1047
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150511/b0ae7ddd/attachment.html