[aerogear-dev] Metrics Endpoint (was: Re: Advanced Analtyics, new PR and call to the client tech leads)

Sebastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Mon May 11 09:38:00 EDT 2015


On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just to be clear, we are talking about metrics for messages delivered
>>> (received on device) or about really read/open?
>>>
>>> Because in Android land is not possible know when message was
>>> read/opened. We delegate how the message will be delivered/showed to the
>>> MessageHandler[1] and we don't have access to it.
>>>
>>
>> when the user clicks on the message, the app opens. That's what we track
>> w/ this PR, not the actual: I read the message - more "App was opened due
>> to push", see:
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-971
>>
>
> I can't do that. I can't do an action when app was opened. To do that we
> would need to create our own application[1] class, and all projects would
> need to extend it. As I have told in my previous email, for now I only can
> do something when the message is delivered to the device.
>
But at least we could provide a (static) method that the developer can call
and that sends the analytics, right ?

>
> [1] http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Application.html
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Today we only have access when the message is delivered. Basically we
>>> receive the message in a AeroGearGCMMessageReceiver[2] do some checks and
>>> push the message for all Handles registered[3][4]
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-android-push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/android/unifiedpush/MessageHandler.java
>>> [2]
>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-android-push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/android/unifiedpush/gcm/AeroGearGCMMessageReceiver.java
>>> [3]
>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-android-push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/android/unifiedpush/RegistrarManager.java#L118
>>> [4]
>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-android-push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/android/unifiedpush/RegistrarManager.java#L130
>>>
>>> -- Passos
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> as discussed on the previous thread, there will be a new endpoint to
>>>> 'track' the "App opened/launched due to received push notification".
>>>>
>>>> Internally, on the UPS, the Push Message has an ID, which get's append
>>>> to the payload of the notification, like here:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/matzew/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/analytics/push/sender/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/sender/APNsPushNotificationSender.java#L107-L108
>>>>
>>>> On the client SDKs this will be read and a HTTP call made to the soon
>>>> introduced MetricsEndpoint. Currently this info is send to the
>>>> RegistrationEndpoint, including the deviceToken/registrationId. However, I
>>>> think that the deviceToken/registrationId is currently not needed for
>>>> metrics, since we are just interested in anonymous "app launched/opened due
>>>> to push", and not a specific "DEVICE X did open, while DEVICE Y did not yet
>>>> open".
>>>>
>>>> So all we really need is the ID of the push notification, to be
>>>> processed by our Metrics Service
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/matzew/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/analytics/jaxrs/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/rest/registry/installations/InstallationRegistrationEndpoint.java#L128-L133
>>>>
>>>> Therefore my proposal is have an endpoint:
>>>>
>>>> PUT /metrics/pushmessage/{pushMessageID}
>>>>
>>>> I think PUT is good/best, because there is nothing really created on
>>>> the server, it's more updating the 'counter' on the existing
>>>> PushMessageInformation object.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Passos
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150511/148f45d6/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list