[aerogear-dev] verification of JMS workflow

[Lukas Fryc]

I've updated the related issue to track the idea:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1521

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> awesome, great to hear -
>
> For the 1.1.x (mainly 1.1.1 first ;-)) let's see if we can provide an
> optimized strategy. Lukas was already hinting this on IRC.
>
> Tomas, thanks for the updates and the testing effort!
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Tomáš Hradec <thradec at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I did some testing of JMS workflow used in UPS during sending
>> notifications. I can confirm, that suggested blocking strategy, as
>> protection against OOM errors, works as expected. However in worst scenario
>> could cause blocking 6 of 20 threads (from MDBs pool). So I would suggest
>> using different approach, with more optimal resource usage, some options
>> were discussed already with Lukas.
>>
>> Regards
>> Tomas
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Lukáš Fryč
Software Engineer
Red Hat Mobile | AeroGear.org, FeedHenry.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20151105/8ace8ac4/attachment.html