[aerogear-dev] SimplePush Polyfill work

[Bruno Oliveira]

Do you have any reference about the encryption discussion. I'd be interested to read more about it.



—
abstractj 
PGP: 0x84DC9914

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:59 PM, JR Conlin <jrconlin at gmail.com> wrote:

> +4
> (sorry, just had some fun with a bounding issue, and felt like sharing.)
> Just to let y'all know, we're going to be running SimplePush for a
> while, mostly for older devices. One thing we discovered is that some
> clients may have a LARGE number of old channels registered and sending
> them as part of the Hello is a waste. (Our server doesn't pay attention
> to them.) Newer clients may have an interim fix that blanks the
> clientIDs:[] record.) Aside from that, we're definitely not going to be
> pushing any changes that should impact your library.
> We've not stood up a production WebPush server, partly because the data
> encryption portion of the standard is still under discussion. For what
> it's worth, there are also a few other discussion points that have yet
> to be finalized (e.g. should developers register with servers, should
> clients specify channels like they did for SimplePush, etc.) but the
> data bit is the biggest obstacle.
> As always, thanks so much for the continuing support.
> On 8/31/2015 12:45 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>> --
>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy at gmail.com <mailto:Idel.Pivnitskiy at gmail.com>
>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Daniel Bevenius
>> <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     +1
>>
>>
>>     måndag 31 augusti 2015 skrev Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:scm.blanc at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>         +1
>>
>>         On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Luke Holmquist
>>         <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>             so now that WebPush is going to take over SimplePush, i'm
>>             thinking of closing the related JIRA's that we have open
>>             for simple push in the AG-JS instance.
>>
>>
>>             Not that we've really done any work on it lately,  but it
>>             would be good to clean this up a little.
>>
>>
>>             Thoughts?
>>
>>
>>             -Luke
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             aerogear-dev mailing list
>>             aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>             https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     aerogear-dev mailing list
>>     aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150901/30692ea3/attachment.html