[aerogear-dev] Github Protected Branches

[Matthias Wessendorf]

same here. I think perhaps we "just" protect master?

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> I feel 50/50 about it, sometimes we have to rebase and fix some mess in
> the Git tree.
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/blog/2051-protected-branches-and-required-status-checks
>>
>> I think this would be good for us to implement
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150907/05554c99/attachment.html