[aerogear-dev] UPS : Errors in Category Insertion

Sébastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Fri Jan 22 06:21:20 EST 2016


@Erik can you make sure that your fix is covered by a unit test as well ?

Envoyé de mon iPhone

> Le 22 janv. 2016 à 11:39, Lukas Fryc <lfryc at redhat.com> a écrit :
> 
> +1 exactly what I was thinking about :-)
> 
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> It would be good if the model/jpa folder has a test case for that :) 
>> 
>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Vivek Pandey <vivek.pandey at pinelabs.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Lukas, I have logged a bug for this issue https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1568
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Lukas Fryc [mailto:lfryc at redhat.com] 
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 7:14 PM
>>> To: vivek.pandey at pinelabs.com; AeroGear Developer Mailing List
>>> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS : Errors in Category Insertion
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Hi Vivek,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> This certainly seems like a bug and is worth to report, and we should look into it in 1.1.1.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I know Sebastien did some work around categories optimizations that is likely related.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Vivek Pandey <vivek.pandey at pinelabs.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have been able to narrow down the issue to following scenario.
>>> 
>>> Suppose we insert an installation with following payload
>>> 
>>> {"deviceToken":"q1wS", "alias":"1 at xyz", "categories":["offer"]}
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Later, when the installation is updated
>>> 
>>> {"deviceToken":"q1wS", "alias":"2 at xyz", "categories":["offer"]}
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> We are seeing the exception mentioned below. This happens in 1.0.3 and 1.1.0 Final as well.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: aerogear-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:aerogear-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Vivek Pandey
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 5:07 PM
>>> To: 'AeroGear Developer Mailing List'
>>> Subject: [aerogear-dev] UPS : Errors in Category Insertion
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Hello UPS Team,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I am noticing a strange problem in UPS 1.0.3. The primary key of the table “category” is out of sync with the sequence “category_seq”.
>>> 
>>> The id column contains negative values too. We are seeing error messages like
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>         ... 76 more
>>> 
>>> Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "category_pkey"
>>> 
>>>   Detail: Key (id)=(192524) already exists.
>>> 
>>>         at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.receiveErrorResponse(QueryExecutorImpl.java:2157)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I have attached the complete log for reference.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> We are using Postgres 9.3 and wildfly 8.1.0.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Is it a known issue which is fixed in 1.1.0 Final?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I am working to find the root cause and will communicate as soon as I have one.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Vivek
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely for the use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check this email and attachments for the presence of viruses / malwares etc. Pine Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely for the use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check this email and attachments for the presence of viruses / malwares etc. Pine Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely for the use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check this email and attachments for the presence of viruses / malwares etc. Pine Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Lukáš Fryč
>>> 
>>> Software Engineer
>>> 
>>> Red Hat Mobile | AeroGear.org, FeedHenry.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely for the use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check this email and attachments for the presence of viruses / malwares etc. Pine Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lukáš Fryč
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat Mobile | AeroGear.org, FeedHenry.org
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160122/78b6d939/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list