[aerogear-dev] UPS 1.2.0+ on WF10/JDK8 - should we continue supporting WF8/JDK7?

[Idel Pivnitskiy]

+1 that release which works only with JDK-8 and WF10 should be called 2.0.0

+2 that time to move to JDK-8 :) of course if we don't have special
requirements to support JDK-7

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> Another thing is, Keycloak also is now JDK-8:
> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/1.8.1.Final#building
>
> (current release is 1.9.1 and 2.0.0-CR1 is in the making)
>
> And one of the JDKs even called Java7 dead, sure... that's not that
> important.
>
> I am very supportive of this, especially our main server platforms
> (WildFly and EAP) are also Java8 only with the latest releases
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> For our work, required for supporting APNs' HTTP/2 APIs we also need
>> JDK-8.
>>
>> I wonder if we should call the release 2.0.0, and really aim only
>> WF10/EAP7 + (Open)JDK-8
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas at fryc.eu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> we are working on delivering some improvements in UPS messaging
>>> subsystem in 1.2.0,
>>>
>>> and part of that is also adoption of WF10 (with ActiveMQ Artemis
>>> underneath).
>>>
>>>
>>> The problem is that WF10 is JDK8 only, so if we use it for tests, we are
>>> limiting ourselves to JDK8-only build. We could run it on WF8 with JDK7,
>>> off course.
>>>
>>> Question is, do we want to support WF8 with UPS 1.2.0+, or should we
>>> switch to WF10 only?
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> ~ Lukas
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160318/ff6e96c1/attachment-0001.html