[aerogear-dev] UPS 1.2.0+ on WF10/JDK8 - should we continue supporting WF8/JDK7?

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com
> wrote:

> +1 that release which works only with JDK-8 and WF10 should be called 2.0.0
>
> +2 that time to move to JDK-8 :) of course if we don't have special
> requirements to support JDK-7
>

for HTTP/2 and APNs, we need JDK8, I think this is the important message
here :)


>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Another thing is, Keycloak also is now JDK-8:
>> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/1.8.1.Final#building
>>
>> (current release is 1.9.1 and 2.0.0-CR1 is in the making)
>>
>> And one of the JDKs even called Java7 dead, sure... that's not that
>> important.
>>
>> I am very supportive of this, especially our main server platforms
>> (WildFly and EAP) are also Java8 only with the latest releases
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> For our work, required for supporting APNs' HTTP/2 APIs we also need
>>> JDK-8.
>>>
>>> I wonder if we should call the release 2.0.0, and really aim only
>>> WF10/EAP7 + (Open)JDK-8
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas at fryc.eu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> we are working on delivering some improvements in UPS messaging
>>>> subsystem in 1.2.0,
>>>>
>>>> and part of that is also adoption of WF10 (with ActiveMQ Artemis
>>>> underneath).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that WF10 is JDK8 only, so if we use it for tests, we
>>>> are limiting ourselves to JDK8-only build. We could run it on WF8 with
>>>> JDK7, off course.
>>>>
>>>> Question is, do we want to support WF8 with UPS 1.2.0+, or should we
>>>> switch to WF10 only?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> ~ Lukas
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160318/571163f3/attachment.html