From matzew at apache.org Tue Nov 1 02:39:22 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:39:22 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Support for Aerogear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, the Unified Push Server is part of the Red Hat Mobile Application Platform (RHMAP): http://blog.feedhenry.com/release-of-rhmap-3-6-0-including-unified-push-server-integration/ HTH, Matthias On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Gorla, Vinod (NonEmp) < vinod.gorla at kroger.com> wrote: > Hi Aerogear team, > > Now that Redhat has Feedhenry as mobile platform for both development and > backend how much support will Aerogear receive from Redhat? I have read > that LiveOak MBaaS is stopped. Can you please give me some info that would > be helpful for me to make a right choice for the push platform? > > > Thanks > Vinod > > ------------------------------ > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and > protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Any unauthorized review, > use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies > of the original message. > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161101/76163503/attachment.html From aliok at redhat.com Tue Nov 1 02:40:51 2016 From: aliok at redhat.com (Ali Ok) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:40:51 +0300 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Support for Aerogear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Vinod, Feedhenry (RHMAP) is fully supported by Red Hat. Aerogear components are used in RHMAP, so they are active projects. For example, just recently we released an initial version of Aerogear Digger [1]. Push is used as the main push technology in RHMAP, so you should expect a good amount of activity and support in there. You can check the repositories of push related things in Aerogear organization [2]. You can see the activitiy there. [1]: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2016-October/012622.html [2]: https://github.com/aerogear?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=push Cheers, Ali On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Gorla, Vinod (NonEmp) < vinod.gorla at kroger.com> wrote: > Hi Aerogear team, > > Now that Redhat has Feedhenry as mobile platform for both development and > backend how much support will Aerogear receive from Redhat? I have read > that LiveOak MBaaS is stopped. Can you please give me some info that would > be helpful for me to make a right choice for the push platform? > > > Thanks > Vinod > > ------------------------------ > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and > protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Any unauthorized review, > use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies > of the original message. > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161101/15a7f68a/attachment.html From aliok at redhat.com Tue Nov 1 04:41:44 2016 From: aliok at redhat.com (Ali Ok) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:41:44 +0300 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [Build Containers] CI integration for Android builds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Matthias, It looks great :) It would be super cool if the platform Docker image was not downloaded in every build. But I gave it a try and loading from cache is almost as slow as downloading the platform image (Travis uses S3 I think). I tried to use "docker save" and "docker load" features. Other option is to find a platform image which is tailored just for our needs hence smaller. I don't know how much extra stuff is in the image that we don't need. Any ideas? Cheers On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi, > > sometimes Travis' Android support is a bit instable..., we have noticed > that on our own Anroid apps, as well on our different libraries. > Today I've done a simple test to use our new tool for CI builds of Android > apps (see [1]). > > For now I've used Travis ;-) but not their Android support, I am just > executing a few docker commands. So this solution is also easy to use on > other systems, like Jenkins. > > Works fine: > https://travis-ci.org/matzew/helloworld-android-gradle/ > builds/169769410#L389 > > > However, there is one bug on the underlying Python CLI (see [2])....., but > overall it's something we should be looking forward to use! > > Cheers, > Matthias > > [1] https://github.com/matzew/helloworld-android-gradle/pull/2 > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDIGGER-15 > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161101/1469e0f0/attachment.html From vinod.gorla at kroger.com Tue Nov 1 09:18:07 2016 From: vinod.gorla at kroger.com (Gorla, Vinod (NonEmp)) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:18:07 +0000 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Support for Aerogear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Matthias. Vinod From: > on behalf of Matthias Wessendorf > Reply-To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List > Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 2:39 AM To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List > Cc: "aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org" > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] Support for Aerogear Hello, the Unified Push Server is part of the Red Hat Mobile Application Platform (RHMAP): http://blog.feedhenry.com/release-of-rhmap-3-6-0-including-unified-push-server-integration/ HTH, Matthias On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Gorla, Vinod (NonEmp) > wrote: Hi Aerogear team, Now that Redhat has Feedhenry as mobile platform for both development and backend how much support will Aerogear receive from Redhat? I have read that LiveOak MBaaS is stopped. Can you please give me some info that would be helpful for me to make a right choice for the push platform? Thanks Vinod ________________________________ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf ________________________________ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161101/a976e43e/attachment-0001.html From vinod.gorla at kroger.com Tue Nov 1 09:18:15 2016 From: vinod.gorla at kroger.com (Gorla, Vinod (NonEmp)) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:18:15 +0000 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Support for Aerogear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Ali. Vinod From: > on behalf of Ali Ok > Reply-To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List > Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 2:40 AM To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List > Cc: "aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org" > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] Support for Aerogear Hi Vinod, Feedhenry (RHMAP) is fully supported by Red Hat. Aerogear components are used in RHMAP, so they are active projects. For example, just recently we released an initial version of Aerogear Digger [1]. Push is used as the main push technology in RHMAP, so you should expect a good amount of activity and support in there. You can check the repositories of push related things in Aerogear organization [2]. You can see the activitiy there. [1]: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2016-October/012622.html [2]: https://github.com/aerogear?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=push Cheers, Ali On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Gorla, Vinod (NonEmp) > wrote: Hi Aerogear team, Now that Redhat has Feedhenry as mobile platform for both development and backend how much support will Aerogear receive from Redhat? I have read that LiveOak MBaaS is stopped. Can you please give me some info that would be helpful for me to make a right choice for the push platform? Thanks Vinod ________________________________ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev ________________________________ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161101/b4b4b793/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Fri Nov 4 03:46:31 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:46:31 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [Aerogear-users] Unexpected error running Liquibase: Precondition Error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: possible that there may be problems w/ the migration from a 1.0.x version to master On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Sonu Kumar Gupta < sonu.gupta at skymetweather.com> wrote: > Dear Sir, > > > > Pls. help > > > > I am starting wildfly with ./standalone.sh --server-config=standalone-full.xml > It works without errors. > > > I cloned latest aerogear-unifiedpush-server and installed with maven > > > I follow the steps in https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/ > index/#server-installation. > > I am using postgres database. It is running on localhost and the port is > 5432. postgres connector version is postgresql-9.4.1207.jar. > > > > I created all databases. Generated the UnifiedPush Database and Datasource. > > liquibase.properties contains the following info > > > > url=jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/unifiedpush > > driver=org.postgresql.Driver > > username=unifiedpush > > password=unifiedpush > > changeLogFile=liquibase/master.xml > > > > *ON STEP 'CREATE THE DATABASE SCHEMA'* > I run ./bin/ups-migrator update > I get the error 'Unexpected error running Liquibase: Precondition error' > > > > > > Regards, > > Sonu Kumar Gupta > > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161104/bcfc4c99/attachment.html From lholmqui at redhat.com Mon Nov 7 11:05:38 2016 From: lholmqui at redhat.com (Luke Holmquist) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:05:38 -0500 Subject: [aerogear-dev] UPS Node sender 0.14.1 Message-ID: Hey peeps, There was an issue on stack overflow, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40429670/unifiedpush-node-sender-completion-block-not-triggered The notification would be sent ok, but the node clients promise would always be rejected, it turns out we were looking for a 200 status, and not a 202(which is what is returned and defined in the REST api docs). I've updated this and pushed out a 0.14.1 release on Saturday night. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161107/cb0f71fb/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Mon Nov 7 11:11:29 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:11:29 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [Aerogear-users] UPS Node sender 0.14.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ?? On Monday, 7 November 2016, Luke Holmquist wrote: > Hey peeps, There was an issue on stack overflow, http:// > stackoverflow.com/questions/40429670/unifiedpush-node- > sender-completion-block-not-triggered > > The notification would be sent ok, but the node clients promise would > always be rejected, it turns out we were looking for a 200 status, and not > a 202(which is what is returned and defined in the REST api docs). > > I've updated this and pushed out a 0.14.1 release on Saturday night. > > > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161107/f8ed6ff7/attachment-0001.html From supittma at redhat.com Tue Nov 8 09:31:03 2016 From: supittma at redhat.com (Summers Pittman) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:31:03 -0500 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Spreading the github ownership love Message-ID: Pretty much $SUBJECT. I was noticing that we don't have that many of the main client contributors listed as project owners in the AeroGear team. Perhaps it is time for some promotions? Summers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161108/8f2870d5/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Tue Nov 8 10:58:26 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:58:26 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Spreading the github ownership love In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +10000 On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Summers Pittman wrote: > Pretty much $SUBJECT. > > I was noticing that we don't have that many of the main client > contributors listed as project owners in the AeroGear team. Perhaps it is > time for some promotions? > > Summers > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161108/d137b858/attachment.html From corinnekrych at gmail.com Wed Nov 9 02:40:06 2016 From: corinnekrych at gmail.com (Corinne Krych) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 08:40:06 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Spreading the github ownership love In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: @Matthias could you grant me the owner role? ++ Corinne On 8 November 2016 at 16:58, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > +10000 > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Summers Pittman > wrote: > >> Pretty much $SUBJECT. >> >> I was noticing that we don't have that many of the main client >> contributors listed as project owners in the AeroGear team. Perhaps it is >> time for some promotions? >> >> Summers >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161109/6b098a90/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Wed Nov 9 03:21:09 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:21:09 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] iOS/Corova: Push: entitlements Message-ID: Hi, the new entitlements file for push, e.g: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-cookbook/blob/master/UnifiedPushHelloWorld/HelloWorldSwift/HelloWorldSwift.entitlements Is this something a developer has to create explicitly, or is this something that is autogenerated with xcode8 ? Also, does our Cordova plugin need to do something in this direction? e.g. generate the file for the app? Thanks! Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161109/564010ad/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Wed Nov 9 03:22:45 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:22:45 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Spreading the github ownership love In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Done! On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Corinne Krych wrote: > @Matthias could you grant me the owner role? > ++ > Corinne > > On 8 November 2016 at 16:58, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > >> +10000 >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Summers Pittman >> wrote: >> >>> Pretty much $SUBJECT. >>> >>> I was noticing that we don't have that many of the main client >>> contributors listed as project owners in the AeroGear team. Perhaps it is >>> time for some promotions? >>> >>> Summers >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161109/fd76d772/attachment.html From corinnekrych at gmail.com Wed Nov 9 03:48:46 2016 From: corinnekrych at gmail.com (Corinne Krych) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:48:46 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] iOS/Corova: Push: entitlements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The dev one is automatically generated by Xcode once you enable Push notification in your project. The key is either 'development' or 'production'. Julio implemented a Cordova hook for aerogear-cordova-notification: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-cordova-push/pull/110/files By default we set it to dev. On 9 November 2016 at 09:21, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi, > > the new entitlements file for push, e.g: > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-cookbook/blob/ > master/UnifiedPushHelloWorld/HelloWorldSwift/HelloWorldSwift.entitlements > > Is this something a developer has to create explicitly, or is this > something that is autogenerated with xcode8 ? > > Also, does our Cordova plugin need to do something in this direction? e.g. > generate the file for the app? > > Thanks! > Matthias > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161109/1bd5b071/attachment-0001.html From matzew at apache.org Fri Nov 11 03:12:31 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:12:31 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Firebase Cloud Messaging token Message-ID: Hi, summers pointed out that the "Server Key(s)" in FCM are being deprecated, and replaced by a "Firebase Cloud Messaging token". In the Firebase API Console, I read the following for the Cloud Messaging Settings: "Firebase Cloud Messaging tokens have replaced server keys for sending messages. While you may continue to use them, support is being deprecated for server keys." OK, that's an easy change for us: It works the same. We need to change the UI to reflect the new name - that's all. I just tested a successful FCM push (WebPush to Chrome), using UPS 1.1.x, with the generated token instead of the server-key. All continues to be fine. BTW. In the Firebase Console, I did not see this yesterday morning (German time), they must have added it later the day :-) Greetings, Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161111/b8bfaf99/attachment.html From corinnekrych at gmail.com Tue Nov 15 08:41:11 2016 From: corinnekrych at gmail.com (Corinne Krych) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:41:11 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Swift 3 is on its way for AeroGear libraries Message-ID: Hello iOS lovers, Swift3 is coming! Today we released to CocoaPods aerogear-ios-http 1.0.0 for Swift3. Thanks tuzonghua for reviewing and help. aerogear-ios-push Swift3 is coming next. aerogear-ios-oauth2 is progressing. @tuzonghua, PR welcome ;) Community contribution on Swift3 migration is welcome! ++ Corinne PS: I love new emoji from CocoaPods: [image: Inline images 1] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161115/561f9dc3/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: unspecified-1.png Type: image/png Size: 24840 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161115/561f9dc3/attachment-0001.png From Jurgen.SIMONS at VRT.BE Wed Nov 23 07:46:20 2016 From: Jurgen.SIMONS at VRT.BE (Jurgen Simons) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:46:20 +0000 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear iOS10 support Message-ID: Hello, I am wondering what your progress on implementing the new iOS 10 rich nofitications is and/or whether you have a time schedule about when it will be available. Thank you for your reply. Best regards, Jurgen Simons -- Disclaimer -- Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52 1043 Brussel nv van publiek recht BTW BE 0244.142.664 RPR Brussel VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161123/a7a93659/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Wed Nov 23 12:04:57 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:04:57 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear iOS10 support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, Jurgen, currently we do have a JIRA in this epic: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1452 atm we have not yet scheduled this feature to be implement, so there is no new iOS 10 rich notification atm, or in the (very) near future On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Jurgen Simons wrote: > Hello, > > > I am wondering what your progress on implementing the new iOS 10 rich > nofitications is and/or whether you have a time schedule about when it will > be available. Thank you for your reply. > > Best regards, > > Jurgen Simons > > > -- Disclaimer -- > Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie > Auguste Reyerslaan 52 > 1043 Brussel > > nv van publiek recht > BTW BE 0244.142.664 > RPR Brussel > VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161123/1d3b8947/attachment.html From michael at 410labs.com Wed Nov 23 12:29:33 2016 From: michael at 410labs.com (Michael Doo) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:29:33 -0500 Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear iOS OAuth2 Swift 3 and pending PRs Message-ID: Hello, There's a big change to the AeroGear iOS OAuth2 library: it's now been migrated to Swift 3! ??? It still needs to be published to the main CocoaPods Specs repo for wider adoption (all 65 GitHub stars' worth), so if you want to use it, for now point your Podfile to the AeroGear repo. There are also three pending pull requests that I'd appreciate a review on: * #64 Update Podspec - A simple PR to update the version of the AeroGear iOS Http library that is required by the library * #63 Add audience and server code - This allows developers to validate the refresh/access token request being made as well as do cross-client auth so a mobile app and server backend are essentially viewed as one application to be authorized * #62 Add ID token to auth response - Many OAuth2 providers now send a JWT ID token along with the other usual tokens that provides extra information about a user, e.g., user ID, address, phone number, etc. These PRs are pretty small, but I think add some good functionality to the library! My next planned pieces of work are: * Switch Google to use SFSafariViewController - Per a post on the Google dev blog ( https://developers.googleblog.com/2016/08/modernizing-oauth-interactions-in-native-apps.html), they will soon be disallowing embedded web views to do the OAuth2 dance. The solution is to use SFSafariViewController (or just the regular Safari browser). This already exists in the library, but Google needs to be special-cased to never accept an embedded web view as an option. * Better cookie management to support multiple accounts - Some services (like Google) provide an account picker for a user to choose from. This is a much better UX. However, not all OAuth2 providers are as cool as Google. For these providers, you cannot currently sign into multiple accounts using the OAuth2 library unless you clear cookies before the embedded web view is presented. Will be working on a solution to do this. Best, Michael Doo 410 Labs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161123/beaf6996/attachment.html From corinnekrych at gmail.com Thu Nov 24 03:32:03 2016 From: corinnekrych at gmail.com (Corinne Krych) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:32:03 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear iOS OAuth2 Swift 3 and pending PRs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you Micheal! Indeed a CocoaPods release is coming soon (coming week). Response inline. On 23 November 2016 at 18:29, Michael Doo wrote: > Hello, > > There's a big change to the AeroGear iOS OAuth2 library: it's now been > migrated to Swift 3! ??? It still needs to be published to the main > CocoaPods Specs repo for wider adoption (all 65 GitHub stars' worth), so if > you want to use it, for now point your Podfile to the AeroGear repo. There > are also three pending pull requests that I'd appreciate a review on: > > * #64 Update Podspec - A simple PR to update the version of the AeroGear > iOS Http library that is required by the library > +1 > * #63 Add audience and server code - This allows developers to validate > the refresh/access token request being made as well as do cross-client auth > so a mobile app and server backend are essentially viewed as one > application to be authorized > I need a closer look at this one. It would be nice to have a use case. Our demo app is: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-cookbook/tree/master/Shoot I wrote this article: http://corinnekrych.blogspot.fr/2015/01/sharing-keychain-access-in-share.html to talk about extension (ie cross-client via keychain sharing tokens) could it be a use case? * #62 Add ID token to auth response - Many OAuth2 providers now send a JWT > ID token along with the other usual tokens that provides extra information > about a user, e.g., user ID, address, phone number, etc. > agreed (PR merged) > > These PRs are pretty small, but I think add some good functionality to the > library! My next planned pieces of work are: > > * Switch Google to use SFSafariViewController - Per a post on the Google > dev blog (https://developers.googleblog.com/2016/08/modernizing-oauth- > interactions-in-native-apps.html), they will soon be disallowing embedded > web views to do the OAuth2 dance. The solution is to use > SFSafariViewController (or just the regular Safari browser). This already > exists in the library, but Google needs to be special-cased to never accept > an embedded web view as an option. > Agreed it is in the todo list for a bit, here the jira https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGIOS-531 > * Better cookie management to support multiple accounts - Some services > (like Google) provide an account picker for a user to choose from. This is > a much better UX. However, not all OAuth2 providers are as cool as Google. > For these providers, you cannot currently sign into multiple accounts using > the OAuth2 library unless you clear cookies before the embedded web view is > presented. Will be working on a solution to do this. > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGIOS-532 created for this one > Best, > Michael Doo > 410 Labs > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161124/c5ea973b/attachment-0001.html From mm at napp.dk Mon Nov 28 09:49:32 2016 From: mm at napp.dk (=?utf-8?B?TWFkcyBNw7hsbGVy?=) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:49:32 +0000 Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Unified Push Server on AWS? Message-ID: <58AC7BDB-D219-47A4-9347-FA0F3C8885FB@napp.dk> Hi there, We want to move our AeroGear Push server to Amazon. We are looking into using either EC2 or their Container Service. Is there any pros/cons w eshould know about? Is one or the other a perferred choice? Secondly, are there any migration process, or do we just copy/paste the database to the new server? I cannot find any information regarding this. cheers BEST REGARDS __________________ MADS M?LLER TECHNICAL PARTNER Napp A/S T: +45 42 42 80 60 M: +45 20 28 20 26 E: mm at napp.dk W: https://napp.dk __________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161128/f1b2120f/attachment.html From Jurgen.SIMONS at VRT.BE Mon Nov 28 12:29:44 2016 From: Jurgen.SIMONS at VRT.BE (Jurgen Simons) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:29:44 +0000 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear iOS10 support In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: Hello Matthias, Thanks for your reply. In the JIRA issue I see Wildfly 10.1 is needed. Do you expect migrating from Wildfly 8.2.1 to Wildfly 10.1 requires (major) modifications to the aerogear source code or do you think it should work out of the box? Any recommendations are welcome. Best regards, Jurgen ________________________________ Van: aerogear-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org namens Matthias Wessendorf Verzonden: woensdag 23 november 2016 18:04:57 Aan: AeroGear Developer Mailing List Onderwerp: Re: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear iOS10 support Hello, Jurgen, currently we do have a JIRA in this epic: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1452 atm we have not yet scheduled this feature to be implement, so there is no new iOS 10 rich notification atm, or in the (very) near future On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Jurgen Simons > wrote: Hello, I am wondering what your progress on implementing the new iOS 10 rich nofitications is and/or whether you have a time schedule about when it will be available. Thank you for your reply. Best regards, Jurgen Simons -- Disclaimer -- Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52 1043 Brussel nv van publiek recht BTW BE 0244.142.664 RPR Brussel VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Disclaimer -- Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52 1043 Brussel nv van publiek recht BTW BE 0244.142.664 RPR Brussel VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161128/6ff418ec/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Tue Nov 29 15:20:03 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:20:03 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear iOS10 support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It's a bit of work, yes - but I'd assume there is a guide. one of the internals did change, the JMS broker (relying on specific API, not standard JMS api) On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Jurgen Simons wrote: > Hello Matthias, > > > Thanks for your reply. In the JIRA issue I see Wildfly 10.1 is needed. Do > you expect migrating from Wildfly 8.2.1 to Wildfly 10.1 requires (major) > modifications to the aerogear source code or do you think it should work > out of the box? Any recommendations are welcome. > > > Best regards, > > > Jurgen > ------------------------------ > *Van:* aerogear-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org jboss.org> namens Matthias Wessendorf > *Verzonden:* woensdag 23 november 2016 18:04:57 > *Aan:* AeroGear Developer Mailing List > *Onderwerp:* Re: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear iOS10 support > > Hello, Jurgen, > > currently we do have a JIRA in this epic: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1452 > > atm we have not yet scheduled this feature to be implement, so there is no > new iOS 10 rich notification atm, or in the (very) near future > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Jurgen Simons > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> I am wondering what your progress on implementing the new iOS 10 rich >> nofitications is and/or whether you have a time schedule about when it will >> be available. Thank you for your reply. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jurgen Simons >> >> >> -- Disclaimer -- >> Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie >> Auguste Reyerslaan 52 >> 1043 Brussel >> >> nv van publiek recht >> BTW BE 0244.142.664 >> RPR Brussel >> VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > -- Disclaimer -- > Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie > Auguste Reyerslaan 52 > 1043 Brussel > > nv van publiek recht > BTW BE 0244.142.664 <02441%2042664> > RPR Brussel > VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161129/c2e0ebbe/attachment-0001.html From matzew at apache.org Tue Nov 29 15:23:48 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:23:48 +0100 Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Unified Push Server on AWS? In-Reply-To: <58AC7BDB-D219-47A4-9347-FA0F3C8885FB@napp.dk> References: <58AC7BDB-D219-47A4-9347-FA0F3C8885FB@napp.dk> Message-ID: On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Mads M?ller wrote: > Hi there, > > > > We want to move our AeroGear Push server to Amazon. We are looking into > using either EC2 or their Container Service. Is there any pros/cons w > eshould know about? > > Is one or the other a perferred choice? > I think both sound like reasonable approaches, while the docker one seems to be easier? we have docker images, hower for the DB that uses links, atm... on something more mature, like Openshift3/Kubernetes, you would use services > > > Secondly, are there any migration process, or do we just copy/paste the > database to the new server? I cannot find any information regarding this. > perhaps using a database dump? > > > cheers > > > > > > > > BEST REGARDS > > *__________________* > > *MADS M?LLER* > > TECHNICAL PARTNER > > > > Napp A/S > > T: +45 42 42 80 60 <+45%2042%2042%2080%2060> > > M: +45 20 28 20 26 <+45%2020%2028%2020%2026> > > E: mm at napp.dk > > W: https://napp.dk > > *__________________* > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20161129/0cff89ef/attachment.html