From geraldo.amaral at camara.leg.br Thu Sep 1 10:57:14 2016 From: geraldo.amaral at camara.leg.br (Geraldo Amaral Filho) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:57:14 -0300 Subject: [aerogear-dev] Retrieve categories of a device token In-Reply-To: References: <021bb7a0-d214-66be-92d1-0a2290af9491@camara.leg.br> Message-ID: <0ebd0c00-10c5-27e5-4153-9d266b01c4c0@camara.leg.br> Idel, Thanks for your answer. Now I have another problem, when I access the URL "https://SERVER:PORT/CONTEXT/rest/applications/[variantID]/installations/" I receive a 401 HTTP status saying: "JBWEB000121: This request requires HTTP authentication." I searched a bit and it seems that I need a Keycloak token. I did not even know about Keycloak and to use its administration console I need an admin user but I do not know the password and my collegue that installed Aerogear doesn't know it either. I have root access to the server and the MySQL DB. How do I reset the Keycloack admin password? Em 29/08/2016 19:33, Idel Pivnitskiy escreveu: > When you register a device on the UPS [1] it returns you a JSON object > of Installation with a new id. You can use this id to retrieve an > Installation object at any time [2], which contains an array of > categories for current device token. We can not guarantee, that device > token will be unique in UPS database, that's why you have to use > Installation.id for feature purposes if needed. > > [1] https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/index.html#246535932 > [2] https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/index.html#-1343907292 -- Geraldo Amaral -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160901/ee2271c0/attachment.html From scm.blanc at gmail.com Thu Sep 8 07:28:25 2016 From: scm.blanc at gmail.com (Sebastien Blanc) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:28:25 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] failing to deploy master on WF 10.10 Message-ID: Yo ! I'm trying to deploy UPS master but I'm getting some weird exceptions : https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/b1acf7267be6770349ffd55693312c33 Looking at the stacktrace it looks likes it has something to do with resteasy and our rest endpoints. Then looking at the latest commits I saw this one : https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/ac34e5b1ab01591bb5e9bb814f8f2ba05a394906 Once this one is reverted I can deploy again. @Idel Did you had any issue deploying UPS with this commit ? Sebi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/dbe4873a/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Thu Sep 8 08:38:39 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:38:39 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] failing to deploy master on WF 10.10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: @sebi, can you deploy when reverting the commint in question ? On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Sebastien Blanc wrote: > Yo ! > > I'm trying to deploy UPS master but I'm getting some weird exceptions : > > https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/b1acf7267be6770349ffd55693312c33 > > > > Looking at the stacktrace it looks likes it has something to do with > resteasy and our rest endpoints. > Then looking at the latest commits I saw this one : > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/ > ac34e5b1ab01591bb5e9bb814f8f2ba05a394906 > > Once this one is reverted I can deploy again. > > @Idel Did you had any issue deploying UPS with this commit ? > > > Sebi > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/dab0ef4c/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Thu Sep 8 08:39:11 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:39:11 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] failing to deploy master on WF 10.10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: FYI I've seen the same, in docker https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1890 -M On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > @sebi, can you deploy when reverting the commint in question ? > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Sebastien Blanc > wrote: > >> Yo ! >> >> I'm trying to deploy UPS master but I'm getting some weird exceptions : >> >> https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/b1acf7267be6770349ffd55693312c33 >> >> >> >> Looking at the stacktrace it looks likes it has something to do with >> resteasy and our rest endpoints. >> Then looking at the latest commits I saw this one : >> >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/comm >> it/ac34e5b1ab01591bb5e9bb814f8f2ba05a394906 >> >> Once this one is reverted I can deploy again. >> >> @Idel Did you had any issue deploying UPS with this commit ? >> >> >> Sebi >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/a40fbacd/attachment.html From scm.blanc at gmail.com Thu Sep 8 08:43:06 2016 From: scm.blanc at gmail.com (Sebastien Blanc) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:43:06 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] failing to deploy master on WF 10.10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > @sebi, can you deploy when reverting the commint in question ? > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Sebastien Blanc > wrote: > >> Yo ! >> >> I'm trying to deploy UPS master but I'm getting some weird exceptions : >> >> https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/b1acf7267be6770349ffd55693312c33 >> >> >> >> Looking at the stacktrace it looks likes it has something to do with >> resteasy and our rest endpoints. >> Then looking at the latest commits I saw this one : >> >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/comm >> it/ac34e5b1ab01591bb5e9bb814f8f2ba05a394906 >> > >> >> Once this one is reverted I can deploy again. >> >> @Idel Did you had any issue deploying UPS with this commit ? >> >> >> Sebi >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/4c8f3410/attachment-0001.html From matzew at apache.org Thu Sep 8 08:45:20 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:45:20 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] failing to deploy master on WF 10.10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: sweet :) On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sebastien Blanc wrote: > Yes > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > >> @sebi, can you deploy when reverting the commint in question ? >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Sebastien Blanc >> wrote: >> >>> Yo ! >>> >>> I'm trying to deploy UPS master but I'm getting some weird exceptions : >>> >>> https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/b1acf7267be6770349ffd55693312c33 >>> >>> >>> >>> Looking at the stacktrace it looks likes it has something to do with >>> resteasy and our rest endpoints. >>> Then looking at the latest commits I saw this one : >>> >>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/comm >>> it/ac34e5b1ab01591bb5e9bb814f8f2ba05a394906 >>> >> >>> >>> Once this one is reverted I can deploy again. >>> >>> @Idel Did you had any issue deploying UPS with this commit ? >>> >>> >>> Sebi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/1e75ec61/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Thu Sep 8 11:21:12 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:21:12 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [AGDROID] new release of store Message-ID: Hi, the store library is about to hit version 3.0.2. Main bug fix: AGDROID-564 The staging repo is located here: https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_staging_profile-8973/ Let me know how testing went, and I'll move it to maven central later this week Cheers! Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/74e0f08a/attachment.html From edewit at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 12:13:35 2016 From: edewit at redhat.com (Erik Jan de Wit) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:13:35 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [AGDROID] new release of store In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Tested it with passos' MessageTest app and works as advertised ;) On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi, > > the store library is about to hit version 3.0.2. > > Main bug fix: AGDROID-564 > > The staging repo is located here: > https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/ > jboss_releases_staging_profile-8973/ > > Let me know how testing went, and I'll move it to maven central later this > week > > Cheers! > Matthias > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Cheers, Erik Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/d3853af4/attachment.html From dpassos at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 13:50:59 2016 From: dpassos at redhat.com (Daniel Passos) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:50:59 -0300 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [AGDROID] new release of store In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1, ship it! On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Erik Jan de Wit wrote: > Tested it with passos' MessageTest app and works as advertised ;) > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the store library is about to hit version 3.0.2. >> >> Main bug fix: AGDROID-564 >> >> The staging repo is located here: >> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >> s_releases_staging_profile-8973/ >> >> Let me know how testing went, and I'll move it to maven central later >> this week >> >> Cheers! >> Matthias >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Erik Jan > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- -- Passos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/2ff30bb4/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Thu Sep 8 14:54:42 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:54:42 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [AGDROID] new release of store In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: /me clicks magic button! :) On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Passos wrote: > +1, ship it! > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Erik Jan de Wit wrote: > >> Tested it with passos' MessageTest app and works as advertised ;) >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the store library is about to hit version 3.0.2. >>> >>> Main bug fix: AGDROID-564 >>> >>> The staging repo is located here: >>> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >>> s_releases_staging_profile-8973/ >>> >>> Let me know how testing went, and I'll move it to maven central later >>> this week >>> >>> Cheers! >>> Matthias >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Erik Jan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > -- Passos > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160908/a232b50c/attachment-0001.html From idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com Fri Sep 9 04:38:27 2016 From: idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com (Idel Pivnitskiy) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 01:38:27 -0700 Subject: [aerogear-dev] failing to deploy master on WF 10.10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, Thanks for the report, Sebi! Let's revert this commit right now. I will take a closer look on the weekend and send a new PR which will not fail the build. Best regards, Idel Pivnitskiy -- Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > sweet :) > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sebastien Blanc > wrote: > >> Yes >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >> wrote: >> >>> @sebi, can you deploy when reverting the commint in question ? >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Sebastien Blanc >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yo ! >>>> >>>> I'm trying to deploy UPS master but I'm getting some weird exceptions : >>>> >>>> https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/b1acf7267be6770349ffd55693312c33 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Looking at the stacktrace it looks likes it has something to do with >>>> resteasy and our rest endpoints. >>>> Then looking at the latest commits I saw this one : >>>> >>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/comm >>>> it/ac34e5b1ab01591bb5e9bb814f8f2ba05a394906 >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> Once this one is reverted I can deploy again. >>>> >>>> @Idel Did you had any issue deploying UPS with this commit ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Sebi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160909/70fd8c0b/attachment.html From scm.blanc at gmail.com Fri Sep 9 04:41:20 2016 From: scm.blanc at gmail.com (Sebastien Blanc) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:41:20 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] failing to deploy master on WF 10.10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks, But it does not fail the build , it is just the deployment that fails. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the report, Sebi! > Let's revert this commit right now. I will take a closer look on the > weekend and send a new PR which will not fail the build. > > Best regards, > Idel Pivnitskiy > -- > Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy > GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > >> sweet :) >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sebastien Blanc >> wrote: >> >>> Yes >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >>> wrote: >>> >>>> @sebi, can you deploy when reverting the commint in question ? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Sebastien Blanc >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yo ! >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to deploy UPS master but I'm getting some weird exceptions >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>> https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/b1acf7267be6770349ffd >>>>> 55693312c33 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Looking at the stacktrace it looks likes it has something to do with >>>>> resteasy and our rest endpoints. >>>>> Then looking at the latest commits I saw this one : >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/comm >>>>> it/ac34e5b1ab01591bb5e9bb814f8f2ba05a394906 >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Once this one is reverted I can deploy again. >>>>> >>>>> @Idel Did you had any issue deploying UPS with this commit ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sebi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160909/2bd340a5/attachment.html From cthompson at smcpartners.com Thu Sep 8 10:48:56 2016 From: cthompson at smcpartners.com (cmthomps) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 07:48:56 -0700 (MST) Subject: [aerogear-dev] Trouble sending a push notification with criteria Message-ID: <1473346136811-12747.post@n5.nabble.com> I'm using PostMan to test sending a push notification to an aerogear server hosted on open shift. I can successfully send a push notification to all devices, but when I try to use an alias to send to only one device the message still gets sent to all. Can someone help? Thanks, Craig This is the contents of the posted message are: { "message": { "alert": "Hello World" }, "criteria": { "alias": ["E7AB13E3-9550-4646-8DB6-5A4971885A8A"] }, "config": { "ttl": 3600 } } -- View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/Trouble-sending-a-push-notification-with-criteria-tp12747.html Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From cthompson at smcpartners.com Thu Sep 8 15:43:32 2016 From: cthompson at smcpartners.com (cmthomps) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:43:32 -0700 (MST) Subject: [aerogear-dev] Trouble sending a push notification with criteria In-Reply-To: <1473346136811-12747.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1473346136811-12747.post@n5.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1473363812605-12752.post@n5.nabble.com> Solved my own problem... Not sure what version of AeroGear that is running on OpenShift but I was able to watch the traffic going from the admin ui and figured out that it was not using the "criteria" section of the payload. This worked. { "alias": [ "EF8AF3C7-32EA-4536-BD59-C8F9177BF14D" ], "message": { "alert": "This works!!!", "sound": "default" } } -- View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/Trouble-sending-a-push-notification-with-criteria-tp12747p12752.html Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From scm.blanc at gmail.com Fri Sep 9 07:05:59 2016 From: scm.blanc at gmail.com (Sebastien Blanc) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 13:05:59 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [RELEASE] Unifiedpush 1.2.0-alpha.2 Message-ID: Hi Folks, I'm happy to announce that the UPS 1.2.0-alpha.2 release has been staged. It's available here : https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_staging_profile-8977 Test and have fun ... I should be pushed next mid-week (along with docker image updates) Sebi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160909/61e2c229/attachment-0001.html From edewit at redhat.com Fri Sep 9 07:43:02 2016 From: edewit at redhat.com (Erik Jan de Wit) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 13:43:02 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] aerogear-cordova-push 3.0.1 Message-ID: Hi, We fixed a couple of bug on aerogear-cordova-push and would like to release it. The 3.0.x branch is ready for testing -- Cheers, Erik Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160909/6c9f93af/attachment.html From niteshglass at gmail.com Fri Sep 9 06:59:42 2016 From: niteshglass at gmail.com (niteshdev) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 03:59:42 -0700 (MST) Subject: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear in Java and Creating Cyptobox using PublicKey Message-ID: <1473418782076-12755.post@n5.nabble.com> Hi There, We are integrating aerogear java library in our java backend. We have list of users public key in base64 string. Now when I want to send a encrypted message to our users. When we are trying to create a instance of CryptoBox then at that time we need to provide a instance of PublicKey. How do we create a publickey Instance from a base64 string or raw bytes. CryptoBox pandora = new CryptoBox(myprivatekey, userspublickey); For the normal RSA i found this snippet over internet but i am assuming that this has to be different for Aerogear. public static PublicKey loadPublicKey(String stored) throws GeneralSecurityException { byte[] data = Base64.decode(stored.toCharArray()); X509EncodedKeySpec spec = new X509EncodedKeySpec(data); KeyFactory fact = KeyFactory.getInstance("RSA"); return fact.generatePublic(spec); } Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Many Thanks, Nitesh -- View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/Aerogear-in-Java-and-Creating-Cyptobox-using-PublicKey-tp12755.html Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From matzew at apache.org Mon Sep 12 03:46:25 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:46:25 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [RELEASE] Unifiedpush 1.2.0-alpha.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On this tag, we need the signed artifacts: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/releases/tag/1.2.0-alpha.2 On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Sebastien Blanc wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm happy to announce that the UPS 1.2.0-alpha.2 release has been staged. > > It's available here : > > https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/ > jboss_releases_staging_profile-8977 > > Test and have fun ... > > I should be pushed next mid-week (along with docker image updates) > > Sebi > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160912/fa1a58f1/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Mon Sep 12 03:56:03 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:56:03 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [RELEASE] Unifiedpush 1.2.0-alpha.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Besides that, I've tested the release (via docker), and it works fine +1 on releasing this On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > On this tag, we need the signed artifacts: > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/ > releases/tag/1.2.0-alpha.2 > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Sebastien Blanc > wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I'm happy to announce that the UPS 1.2.0-alpha.2 release has been staged. >> >> It's available here : >> >> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >> s_releases_staging_profile-8977 >> >> Test and have fun ... >> >> I should be pushed next mid-week (along with docker image updates) >> >> Sebi >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160912/ba0e0584/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Tue Sep 13 04:18:04 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:18:04 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] aerogear-cordova-push 3.0.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Let's ship it! On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Erik Jan de Wit wrote: > Hi, > > We fixed a couple of bug on aerogear-cordova-push and would like to > release it. The 3.0.x branch is ready for testing > > -- > Cheers, > Erik Jan > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160913/d1874bc6/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Tue Sep 13 04:20:27 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:20:27 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] [RELEASE] Unifiedpush 1.2.0-alpha.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've clicked the button, and will upload the missing bits to GH -Matthias On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Besides that, I've tested the release (via docker), and it works fine > > +1 on releasing this > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > >> On this tag, we need the signed artifacts: >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/rele >> ases/tag/1.2.0-alpha.2 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Sebastien Blanc >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> I'm happy to announce that the UPS 1.2.0-alpha.2 release has been >>> staged. >>> >>> It's available here : >>> >>> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >>> s_releases_staging_profile-8977 >>> >>> Test and have fun ... >>> >>> I should be pushed next mid-week (along with docker image updates) >>> >>> Sebi >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160913/1b20449f/attachment-0001.html From matzew at apache.org Tue Sep 13 04:56:20 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:56:20 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear 1.2.0-alpha.2 is out Message-ID: Hello, for 1.2.0-alpha.2 we have ported the FCM work to master from the 1.1.x branch, and added support for MySQL 5.7, WildFly 10 as well as Java8 all details can be found here: https://issues.jboss.org/projects/AGPUSH/versions/12330261 Our docker files are also now using WildFly 10.1 and this latest alpha! https://github.com/aerogear/dockerfiles/pull/21 Hopefully later this year we can finally cut the 1.2.0 release, which mainly will contain a complete decoupling from Keycloak! Greetings, Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160913/b8701876/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Mon Sep 19 11:35:18 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:35:18 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] android-push:4.0.2 Message-ID: Hi, due to FCM related issue, we have a new release in the pipeline: https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_staging_profile-9042/ Main bug fix: AGDROID-566 let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the release buttin PS: another UPS 1.2.0- is coming too -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160919/a0a8da12/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Mon Sep 19 12:07:23 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:07:23 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] UPS 1.2.0-alpha.3 (was: Re: android-push:4.0.2) Message-ID: This was also causing a change on the server, so that the new client SDK is usable, we've a new 1.2.0 alpha: https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_staging_profile-9043/ -Matthias On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi, > > due to FCM related issue, we have a new release in the pipeline: > https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/ > jboss_releases_staging_profile-9042/ > > Main bug fix: AGDROID-566 > > > let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the release buttin > > PS: another UPS 1.2.0- is coming too > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160919/322b1a73/attachment.html From dpassos at redhat.com Wed Sep 21 09:21:46 2016 From: dpassos at redhat.com (Daniel Passos) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:21:46 -0300 Subject: [aerogear-dev] UPS 1.2.0-alpha.3 (was: Re: android-push:4.0.2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I have tested it yesterday (Android land) and it works like a charm. Ship it! On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > This was also causing a change on the server, so that the new client SDK > is usable, we've a new 1.2.0 alpha: > > https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/ > jboss_releases_staging_profile-9043/ > > > -Matthias > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> due to FCM related issue, we have a new release in the pipeline: >> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >> s_releases_staging_profile-9042/ >> >> Main bug fix: AGDROID-566 >> >> >> let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the release buttin >> >> PS: another UPS 1.2.0- is coming too >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- -- Passos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160921/8d2d6b0b/attachment.html From matzew at apache.org Wed Sep 21 09:28:38 2016 From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:28:38 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] UPS 1.2.0-alpha.3 (was: Re: android-push:4.0.2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: clicked the button. will upate GITHUB, and dockerfiles soon-ish On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Passos wrote: > I have tested it yesterday (Android land) and it works like a charm. > > Ship it! > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > >> This was also causing a change on the server, so that the new client SDK >> is usable, we've a new 1.2.0 alpha: >> >> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >> s_releases_staging_profile-9043/ >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> due to FCM related issue, we have a new release in the pipeline: >>> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >>> s_releases_staging_profile-9042/ >>> >>> Main bug fix: AGDROID-566 >>> >>> >>> let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the release buttin >>> >>> PS: another UPS 1.2.0- is coming too >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > -- Passos > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160921/ef9c14f8/attachment-0001.html From morten.oftedal at adresseavisen.no Thu Sep 22 04:36:03 2016 From: morten.oftedal at adresseavisen.no (Morten Oftedal) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:36:03 +0000 Subject: [aerogear-dev] The Metrics RESTFUL api... some inconsistencies Message-ID: Hi! Currently developing an application using UPS 1.1.3 FINAL. We are using the RESTFUL API for fetching information about sent push messages (metrics) and have noticed some inconsistencies in the data; The total receivers number per message does not match the total receivers when adding the variant receivers together. There seems to be some duplicate values when asking for variants. For our application, there are two variants, but the API returns anything from 2-6 different variants with some duplicate Variant IDs. The number of receivers presented on the aerogear admin GUI seems to be an aggregate of the variants, not of the total receivers number from the message. Attached is some metrics results with said errors. Are the numbers representing different things is there some error in counting the number of receivers in one of the methods? Also when sending push messages with defined user data (such as URLs) this data is not saved in the underlying database. Is this a design choice or an upcoming feature? Best Regards Morten Oftedal Adresseavisen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160922/5fe32211/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pushmsg.json Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1677 bytes Desc: pushmsg.json Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160922/5fe32211/attachment.obj From omatskiv at redhat.com Thu Sep 22 05:28:25 2016 From: omatskiv at redhat.com (Oleg Matskiv) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:28:25 +0200 Subject: [aerogear-dev] The Metrics RESTFUL api... some inconsistencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Morten, Total number of receivers is incorrect because in 1.1.3 we started using topics [1]. So when receivers use new version of client library they are subscribed to global topic + topic per category (not sure if we also use topics for aliases). Then when you send notification to whole variant or category, UPS sends one notification for the topic. There could be many receivers for given topic, but in metrics it is represented as one. We already have JIRA ticket [2] for this issue. I don't know about other issues. [1] https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/android/topic-messaging [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1892 Best Regards, Oleg Matskiv On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Morten Oftedal < morten.oftedal at adresseavisen.no> wrote: > Hi! > > > > Currently developing an application using UPS 1.1.3 FINAL. > > > > We are using the RESTFUL API for fetching information about sent push > messages (metrics) and have noticed some inconsistencies in the data; > > > > The total receivers number per message does not match the total receivers > when adding the variant receivers together. > > > > There seems to be some duplicate values when asking for variants. For our > application, there are two variants, but the API returns anything from 2-6 > different variants with some duplicate Variant IDs. > > > > The number of receivers presented on the aerogear admin GUI seems to be an > aggregate of the variants, not of the total receivers number from the > message. > > Attached is some metrics results with said errors. > > > > Are the numbers representing different things is there some error in > counting the number of receivers in one of the methods? > > > > Also when sending push messages with defined user data (such as URLs) this > data is not saved in the underlying database. Is this a design choice or an > upcoming feature? > > > > Best Regards > > Morten Oftedal > > Adresseavisen > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Oleg Matskiv Associate Quality Engineer Red Hat Mobile Application Platform omatskiv at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160922/2599da24/attachment.html From dpassos at redhat.com Thu Sep 22 16:24:03 2016 From: dpassos at redhat.com (Daniel Passos) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:24:03 -0300 Subject: [aerogear-dev] android-push:4.0.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, We found a problem in this stagging and did it again, here is the new link! https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_staging_profile-9069/ Let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the magic release button! On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi, > > due to FCM related issue, we have a new release in the pipeline: > https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/ > jboss_releases_staging_profile-9042/ > > Main bug fix: AGDROID-566 > > > let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the release buttin > > PS: another UPS 1.2.0- is coming too > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- -- Passos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160922/8f865aa9/attachment.html From supittma at redhat.com Fri Sep 23 11:53:30 2016 From: supittma at redhat.com (Summers Pittman) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:53:30 -0400 Subject: [aerogear-dev] android-push:4.0.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 LGTM! On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Passos wrote: > Hello, > > We found a problem in this stagging and did it again, here is the new link! > > https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/ > jboss_releases_staging_profile-9069/ > > Let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the magic release button! > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> due to FCM related issue, we have a new release in the pipeline: >> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >> s_releases_staging_profile-9042/ >> >> Main bug fix: AGDROID-566 >> >> >> let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the release buttin >> >> PS: another UPS 1.2.0- is coming too >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > -- Passos > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160923/d8f78a47/attachment-0001.html From dpassos at redhat.com Fri Sep 23 14:15:18 2016 From: dpassos at redhat.com (Daniel Passos) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:15:18 -0300 Subject: [aerogear-dev] android-push:4.0.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Release magic button clicked On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Summers Pittman wrote: > +1 LGTM! > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Passos wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We found a problem in this stagging and did it again, here is the new >> link! >> >> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >> s_releases_staging_profile-9069/ >> >> Let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the magic release button! >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> due to FCM related issue, we have a new release in the pipeline: >>> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jbos >>> s_releases_staging_profile-9042/ >>> >>> Main bug fix: AGDROID-566 >>> >>> >>> let me know how testing goes, and I'll hit the release buttin >>> >>> PS: another UPS 1.2.0- is coming too >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Passos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- -- Passos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160923/c155c2c1/attachment.html From ibmoreno.cba at gmail.com Wed Sep 28 12:50:23 2016 From: ibmoreno.cba at gmail.com (Ivan Batista Moreno) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:50:23 -0400 Subject: [aerogear-dev] How register my device in UPS with SSL Message-ID: hi, gode morn how register my device in UPS with SSL? error in android: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException tankyou -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160928/31553160/attachment.html From supittma at redhat.com Thu Sep 29 08:50:45 2016 From: supittma at redhat.com (Summers Pittman) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:50:45 -0400 Subject: [aerogear-dev] How register my device in UPS with SSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Ivan Batista Moreno < ibmoreno.cba at gmail.com> wrote: > hi, gode morn > > how register my device in UPS with SSL? > > error in android: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException > It sounds like you are using a self signed SSL certificate. Your options are to get a signed certificate from a trusted CA and host it yourself, deploy to a service like OpenShift which can give you ssl for free, pin your self signed certificate to your android app, or to import your signing key into the Android keystore. Summers > > > tankyou > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160929/f2b0a95b/attachment.html