[aerogear-dev] AeroGear attic ogranization ?

[Matthias Wessendorf]

any comments ?

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we are in the process of cleaning up old repos. In order to avoid a
> deletion - now - I think it would be good to move them into some special GH
> org.
>
> I propose the usage of "aerogear-attic" of all repos that have come to
> their end of life. we can park the there, and see how things evolve - and
> perhaps, eventually we will be deleting them, from there.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Two repos that are already now "archived" (aka read-only) are:
> * https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-offline
> * https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android
>
>
> Thoughts? Should we move these ?
>
> Besides that, here are two relevant threads from passos on some other
> 'eol' repos:
> * http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2017-October/013078.html
> * http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2017-October/013079.html
> (already covered above)
>
> Thoughts? Moving the sync stuff over the attic ?
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Project lead AeroGear.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

github: https://github.com/matzew
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171214/fd101364/attachment.html