[aerogear-dev] Definition of Done

[Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo]

That DoD looks fine to me with one small exception: I wouldn't
consider *Automate
tests (where possible)* as a requisite because then we need to define *when
is possible*. I think it is a good idea to automate as much as possible but
I just wouldn't add it to the DoD. On the other hand, I would include a
"code format meets team formatting standards".

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat

<https://www.redhat.com/>

M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig>

On 14 December 2017 at 16:58, Luigi Zuccarelli <lzuccare at redhat.com> wrote:

> We had our team intro (MCP Service Team 2 - we need to change this name :)
> ) and the discussion of "Definition of Done"
>
> The consensus was to get input form all teams to get some agreement and
> alignment.
>
> Any thoughts ?
>
> Here <https://docs.jboss.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=23724515> is
> the link to the BF/Core team's DoD.
>
> Luigi
>
> --
>
> LUIGI ZUCCARELLI
>
> Associate  MANAGER ENGINEERING , REDHAT MOBILE
>
> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> Communications House Ireland
>
> Cork Road Waterford City
>
> X91NY33
>
> lzuccare at redhat.com    M: +353852156995     IM: lzuccarelli
> <https://red.ht/sig>
> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171221/b20f0d57/attachment.html