From aliok at redhat.com  Wed Oct  4 07:51:09 2017
From: aliok at redhat.com (Ali Ok)
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:51:09 +0300
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Sonatype Nexus permissions for "org.jboss.aerogear"
Message-ID: <CABoO8Ld+X_VbXXLNabvxN4oMV5KPD8GYkbAu91QBR3eQyKPABw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Passos,

Could you give me the permission to release in Sonatype Nexus? I see you
can do it yourself [1].
I would like to be able release Digger related things.

I received permissions to "org.aerogear", but proper one is
"org.jboss.aerogear" [2]

CC @Matzew

[1]: https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-20598
[2]: https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-34060

Thanks,
Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171004/c93d7df3/attachment.html 

From dpassos at redhat.com  Wed Oct  4 09:55:45 2017
From: dpassos at redhat.com (Daniel Passos)
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:55:45 -0300
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Sonatype Nexus permissions for
	"org.jboss.aerogear"
In-Reply-To: <CABoO8Ld+X_VbXXLNabvxN4oMV5KPD8GYkbAu91QBR3eQyKPABw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABoO8Ld+X_VbXXLNabvxN4oMV5KPD8GYkbAu91QBR3eQyKPABw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADF=h2tNhNE43CN+GODCBm=O_y=f4_rvfTqEzcYv3q2PSF_6xQ@mail.gmail.com>

Done!

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Ali Ok <aliok at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello Passos,
>
> Could you give me the permission to release in Sonatype Nexus? I see you
> can do it yourself [1].
> I would like to be able release Digger related things.
>
> I received permissions to "org.aerogear", but proper one is
> "org.jboss.aerogear" [2]
>
> CC @Matzew
>
> [1]: https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-20598
> [2]: https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-34060
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
>



-- 
-- Passos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171004/960010ef/attachment.html 

From jusanche at redhat.com  Wed Oct  4 10:33:43 2017
From: jusanche at redhat.com (Julio Cesar Sanchez Hernandez)
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:33:43 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] aerogear-ios-push 3.0.0 for Swift 4 and
	aerogear-ios-push-objc 2.0.0 released
Message-ID: <CA+-uZpuW0T0vDKWS8A8yi09qC_Hm2h6kYo6vqH1FOvx_wY-7AQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

We have updated aerogear-ios-push to Swift 4 and it has been released in
CocoaPods as AeroGearPush-Swift 3.0.0.

We have moved the Objective-C version to a new repo and also released it
as AeroGearPush 2.0.0.

Both of them drop support for iOS 8.

Notice that the names have been changed for consistency with our other
libs, so you will have to edit your podfiles from

pod 'AeroGear-Push-Swift' to pod 'AeroGearPush-Swift'

and

pod 'AeroGear-Push' to pod 'AeroGearPush'

Searching on CocoaPods website will show the old ones deprecated in favour
of the new ones.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171004/df8ed71e/attachment.html 

From jgallaso at redhat.com  Thu Oct  5 02:52:24 2017
From: jgallaso at redhat.com (Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:52:24 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream
Message-ID: <CAGsbZmGXSMg1GX_g3xOiSo6r8t5VwKxW4rGE09-P+S3AyRJpVw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I see that there are loads of branches pushed to the upstream repo that IMO
shouldn't be there. I think branches should always belong to the forks,
below is the list.

Apart from 1.1.x-dev and master I would like to delete all branches,
specially the ones that are 2 years old!

What do you think about this?

Remote branches:
    1.1.4.Final-rhmap-13.11                tracked
    1.1.x-dev                              tracked
    AGPUSH-1047                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1149_enable_direct_access_grant tracked
    AGPUSH-1299                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368-CherryPick                 tracked
    AGPUSH-1567                            tracked
    AGPUSH-2049                            tracked
    BOM_updates                            tracked
    DIST_update                            tracked
    FLAT_METRICS_1                         tracked
    GSOC_2017_kafka                        tracked
    JDK8                                   tracked
    KC_master_package_renamed              tracked
    LatestParent                           tracked
    Logger                                 tracked
    SenderSnippetUpdates                   tracked
    dimitraz-patch-1                       tracked
    firefox-variant                        tracked
    gcm-topics                             tracked
    hibernate.hbm2ddl                      tracked
    jms-batching                           tracked
    kafka-readme                           tracked
    kafka-readme-1                         tracked
    kc_isolated                            tracked
    master                                 tracked
    pr-template                            tracked
    readme_apns_http/2                     tracked
    release-1.1.0                          tracked
    safari-push                            tracked
    ux-revamp                              tracked
    webpush-variant                        tracked
    wizard_typop                           tracked

Cheers,

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat

<https://www.redhat.com/>

M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171005/c9d74bef/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Thu Oct  5 03:18:03 2017
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:18:03 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream
In-Reply-To: <CAGsbZmGXSMg1GX_g3xOiSo6r8t5VwKxW4rGE09-P+S3AyRJpVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGsbZmGXSMg1GX_g3xOiSo6r8t5VwKxW4rGE09-P+S3AyRJpVw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2TmHGPTvkHwkAjWJJNF=T8Ts0Nqbr6TJ5P_OAxP=fQ4Ow@mail.gmail.com>

Sure, go ahead!

usually a PR is only made from your own fork ;-) but sometimes that is not
always followed rule, but it should be deleted if no longer needed...
However, please keep the "GSOC_2017_kafka" branch, besides the already
mentioned branches.

Let's see what other say

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I see that there are loads of branches pushed to the upstream repo that
> IMO shouldn't be there. I think branches should always belong to the forks,
> below is the list.
>
> Apart from 1.1.x-dev and master I would like to delete all branches,
> specially the ones that are 2 years old!
>
> What do you think about this?
>
> Remote branches:
>     1.1.4.Final-rhmap-13.11                tracked
>     1.1.x-dev                              tracked
>     AGPUSH-1047                            tracked
>     AGPUSH-1149_enable_direct_access_grant tracked
>     AGPUSH-1299                            tracked
>     AGPUSH-1368                            tracked
>     AGPUSH-1368-CherryPick                 tracked
>     AGPUSH-1567                            tracked
>     AGPUSH-2049                            tracked
>     BOM_updates                            tracked
>     DIST_update                            tracked
>     FLAT_METRICS_1                         tracked
>     GSOC_2017_kafka                        tracked
>     JDK8                                   tracked
>     KC_master_package_renamed              tracked
>     LatestParent                           tracked
>     Logger                                 tracked
>     SenderSnippetUpdates                   tracked
>     dimitraz-patch-1                       tracked
>     firefox-variant                        tracked
>     gcm-topics                             tracked
>     hibernate.hbm2ddl                      tracked
>     jms-batching                           tracked
>     kafka-readme                           tracked
>     kafka-readme-1                         tracked
>     kc_isolated                            tracked
>     master                                 tracked
>     pr-template                            tracked
>     readme_apns_http/2                     tracked
>     release-1.1.0                          tracked
>     safari-push                            tracked
>     ux-revamp                              tracked
>     webpush-variant                        tracked
>     wizard_typop                           tracked
>
> Cheers,
>
> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>
> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171005/dce179bc/attachment-0001.html 

From jgallaso at redhat.com  Thu Oct  5 03:40:12 2017
From: jgallaso at redhat.com (Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:40:12 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2TmHGPTvkHwkAjWJJNF=T8Ts0Nqbr6TJ5P_OAxP=fQ4Ow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGsbZmGXSMg1GX_g3xOiSo6r8t5VwKxW4rGE09-P+S3AyRJpVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TmHGPTvkHwkAjWJJNF=T8Ts0Nqbr6TJ5P_OAxP=fQ4Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGsbZmF0SraWYet2vfKczYhXFs-TXtTWyZdp-jEOggTCuLTxyA@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Matthias, I will do it in the afternoon to leave some time for the
rest, just in case.

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat

<https://www.redhat.com/>

M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig>

On 5 October 2017 at 09:18, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Sure, go ahead!
>
> usually a PR is only made from your own fork ;-) but sometimes that is not
> always followed rule, but it should be deleted if no longer needed...
> However, please keep the "GSOC_2017_kafka" branch, besides the already
> mentioned branches.
>
> Let's see what other say
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
> jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see that there are loads of branches pushed to the upstream repo that
>> IMO shouldn't be there. I think branches should always belong to the forks,
>> below is the list.
>>
>> Apart from 1.1.x-dev and master I would like to delete all branches,
>> specially the ones that are 2 years old!
>>
>> What do you think about this?
>>
>> Remote branches:
>>     1.1.4.Final-rhmap-13.11                tracked
>>     1.1.x-dev                              tracked
>>     AGPUSH-1047                            tracked
>>     AGPUSH-1149_enable_direct_access_grant tracked
>>     AGPUSH-1299                            tracked
>>     AGPUSH-1368                            tracked
>>     AGPUSH-1368-CherryPick                 tracked
>>     AGPUSH-1567                            tracked
>>     AGPUSH-2049                            tracked
>>     BOM_updates                            tracked
>>     DIST_update                            tracked
>>     FLAT_METRICS_1                         tracked
>>     GSOC_2017_kafka                        tracked
>>     JDK8                                   tracked
>>     KC_master_package_renamed              tracked
>>     LatestParent                           tracked
>>     Logger                                 tracked
>>     SenderSnippetUpdates                   tracked
>>     dimitraz-patch-1                       tracked
>>     firefox-variant                        tracked
>>     gcm-topics                             tracked
>>     hibernate.hbm2ddl                      tracked
>>     jms-batching                           tracked
>>     kafka-readme                           tracked
>>     kafka-readme-1                         tracked
>>     kc_isolated                            tracked
>>     master                                 tracked
>>     pr-template                            tracked
>>     readme_apns_http/2                     tracked
>>     release-1.1.0                          tracked
>>     safari-push                            tracked
>>     ux-revamp                              tracked
>>     webpush-variant                        tracked
>>     wizard_typop                           tracked
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>>
>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>>
>> Red Hat
>>
>> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>>
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171005/5016df9c/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Thu Oct  5 03:56:42 2017
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:56:42 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream
In-Reply-To: <CAGsbZmF0SraWYet2vfKczYhXFs-TXtTWyZdp-jEOggTCuLTxyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGsbZmGXSMg1GX_g3xOiSo6r8t5VwKxW4rGE09-P+S3AyRJpVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TmHGPTvkHwkAjWJJNF=T8Ts0Nqbr6TJ5P_OAxP=fQ4Ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGsbZmF0SraWYet2vfKczYhXFs-TXtTWyZdp-jEOggTCuLTxyA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2QuBO6m7N5mKHsLn=2-u9LzW5dftEbpMNxU4Yhdq5t61g@mail.gmail.com>

sweet! Thanks for stepping in, and volunteering the clean up !

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:

> Thanks Matthias, I will do it in the afternoon to leave some time for the
> rest, just in case.
>
> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>
> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> On 5 October 2017 at 09:18, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Sure, go ahead!
>>
>> usually a PR is only made from your own fork ;-) but sometimes that is
>> not always followed rule, but it should be deleted if no longer needed...
>> However, please keep the "GSOC_2017_kafka" branch, besides the already
>> mentioned branches.
>>
>> Let's see what other say
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
>> jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see that there are loads of branches pushed to the upstream repo that
>>> IMO shouldn't be there. I think branches should always belong to the forks,
>>> below is the list.
>>>
>>> Apart from 1.1.x-dev and master I would like to delete all branches,
>>> specially the ones that are 2 years old!
>>>
>>> What do you think about this?
>>>
>>> Remote branches:
>>>     1.1.4.Final-rhmap-13.11                tracked
>>>     1.1.x-dev                              tracked
>>>     AGPUSH-1047                            tracked
>>>     AGPUSH-1149_enable_direct_access_grant tracked
>>>     AGPUSH-1299                            tracked
>>>     AGPUSH-1368                            tracked
>>>     AGPUSH-1368-CherryPick                 tracked
>>>     AGPUSH-1567                            tracked
>>>     AGPUSH-2049                            tracked
>>>     BOM_updates                            tracked
>>>     DIST_update                            tracked
>>>     FLAT_METRICS_1                         tracked
>>>     GSOC_2017_kafka                        tracked
>>>     JDK8                                   tracked
>>>     KC_master_package_renamed              tracked
>>>     LatestParent                           tracked
>>>     Logger                                 tracked
>>>     SenderSnippetUpdates                   tracked
>>>     dimitraz-patch-1                       tracked
>>>     firefox-variant                        tracked
>>>     gcm-topics                             tracked
>>>     hibernate.hbm2ddl                      tracked
>>>     jms-batching                           tracked
>>>     kafka-readme                           tracked
>>>     kafka-readme-1                         tracked
>>>     kc_isolated                            tracked
>>>     master                                 tracked
>>>     pr-template                            tracked
>>>     readme_apns_http/2                     tracked
>>>     release-1.1.0                          tracked
>>>     safari-push                            tracked
>>>     ux-revamp                              tracked
>>>     webpush-variant                        tracked
>>>     wizard_typop                           tracked
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>>>
>>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>>>
>>> Red Hat
>>>
>>> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>
>>> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>>>
>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171005/3665df18/attachment-0001.html 

From lfitzger at redhat.com  Thu Oct  5 09:50:02 2017
From: lfitzger at redhat.com (Laura Fitzgerald)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:50:02 +0100
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Youtube
Message-ID: <CA+jLkhXRX6Tqs3-3PCiP34rbeho4m4Tf9hnsYunx6-M3QQ0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi guys,

Is there an existing youtube channel for aerogear videos/demos?

-- 

LAURA FITZGERALD

Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>

Communications House, Cork Road

Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33

lfitzger at redhat.com    IM: lfitzgerald
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171005/0615ac40/attachment.html 

From dpassos at redhat.com  Thu Oct  5 09:59:07 2017
From: dpassos at redhat.com (Daniel Passos)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:59:07 -0300
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Youtube
In-Reply-To: <CA+jLkhXRX6Tqs3-3PCiP34rbeho4m4Tf9hnsYunx6-M3QQ0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+jLkhXRX6Tqs3-3PCiP34rbeho4m4Tf9hnsYunx6-M3QQ0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADF=h2tSOJXY82MMkf=yjj8RpKLnKWgX+t=dz_qQ9BD7OCR8KA@mail.gmail.com>

Hey Laura,

There is the AeroGear Channel[1]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgDcDoN2b7cEI63fgpxACBA

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Laura Fitzgerald <lfitzger at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> Is there an existing youtube channel for aerogear videos/demos?
>
> --
>
> LAURA FITZGERALD
>
> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> Communications House, Cork Road
>
> Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33
>
> lfitzger at redhat.com    IM: lfitzgerald
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
-- Passos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171005/05dd5c71/attachment.html 

From wtrocki at redhat.com  Thu Oct  5 10:11:46 2017
From: wtrocki at redhat.com (Wojciech Trocki)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:11:46 +0100
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Youtube
In-Reply-To: <CADF=h2tSOJXY82MMkf=yjj8RpKLnKWgX+t=dz_qQ9BD7OCR8KA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+jLkhXRX6Tqs3-3PCiP34rbeho4m4Tf9hnsYunx6-M3QQ0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADF=h2tSOJXY82MMkf=yjj8RpKLnKWgX+t=dz_qQ9BD7OCR8KA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO0+n+ryEem9wQoKTaOnwuRbQn-v=71uR+3FyTx3T4w=2x=How@mail.gmail.com>

There is also RedHat videos channel if you looking to host some product
getting started etc.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RedHatVideos

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hey Laura,
>
> There is the AeroGear Channel[1]
>
> [1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgDcDoN2b7cEI63fgpxACBA
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Laura Fitzgerald <lfitzger at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Is there an existing youtube channel for aerogear videos/demos?
>>
>> --
>>
>> LAURA FITZGERALD
>>
>> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>> Communications House, Cork Road
>>
>> Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33
>>
>> lfitzger at redhat.com    IM: lfitzgerald
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Passos
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 

WOJCIECH TROCKI

Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>

IM: wtrocki
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171005/8f55499d/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Thu Oct  5 10:21:08 2017
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:21:08 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Youtube
In-Reply-To: <CAO0+n+ryEem9wQoKTaOnwuRbQn-v=71uR+3FyTx3T4w=2x=How@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+jLkhXRX6Tqs3-3PCiP34rbeho4m4Tf9hnsYunx6-M3QQ0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADF=h2tSOJXY82MMkf=yjj8RpKLnKWgX+t=dz_qQ9BD7OCR8KA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO0+n+ryEem9wQoKTaOnwuRbQn-v=71uR+3FyTx3T4w=2x=How@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2RO1n4pDOSn5OE90Lz3XCZWnk2XzFUefOX05mRCXJup-w@mail.gmail.com>

I think passos is right w/ the AG community channel ;-)

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Wojciech Trocki <wtrocki at redhat.com> wrote:

> There is also RedHat videos channel if you looking to host some product
> getting started etc.
> https://www.youtube.com/user/RedHatVideos
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Laura,
>>
>> There is the AeroGear Channel[1]
>>
>> [1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgDcDoN2b7cEI63fgpxACBA
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Laura Fitzgerald <lfitzger at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Is there an existing youtube channel for aerogear videos/demos?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> LAURA FITZGERALD
>>>
>>> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>
>>> Communications House, Cork Road
>>>
>>> Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33
>>>
>>> lfitzger at redhat.com    IM: lfitzgerald
>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -- Passos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> WOJCIECH TROCKI
>
> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> IM: wtrocki
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171005/fa80261e/attachment-0001.html 

From aliok at redhat.com  Fri Oct  6 03:07:08 2017
From: aliok at redhat.com (Ali Ok)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:07:08 +0300
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Sonatype Nexus permissions for
	"org.jboss.aerogear"
In-Reply-To: <CADF=h2tNhNE43CN+GODCBm=O_y=f4_rvfTqEzcYv3q2PSF_6xQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABoO8Ld+X_VbXXLNabvxN4oMV5KPD8GYkbAu91QBR3eQyKPABw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADF=h2tNhNE43CN+GODCBm=O_y=f4_rvfTqEzcYv3q2PSF_6xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABoO8Lccu-oLmV3Kbe9GX=ak3+Krc8hNgCxdc2RWM8iXD+0bYg@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Passos. It all works now.

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:

> Done!
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Ali Ok <aliok at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Passos,
>>
>> Could you give me the permission to release in Sonatype Nexus? I see you
>> can do it yourself [1].
>> I would like to be able release Digger related things.
>>
>> I received permissions to "org.aerogear", but proper one is
>> "org.jboss.aerogear" [2]
>>
>> CC @Matzew
>>
>> [1]: https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-20598
>> [2]: https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-34060
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ali
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Passos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/3791b498/attachment.html 

From lfitzger at redhat.com  Fri Oct  6 05:58:39 2017
From: lfitzger at redhat.com (Laura Fitzgerald)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:58:39 +0100
Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Digger Logo
In-Reply-To: <CABoO8LfdhDCaQbEogwzp1fwtGdS6UogETey-4pN4ZaDQcQJUfw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABoO8Le_xkQMiTx1Xemd_CJXw3B-zCgvZyyFF0XLLXTdNDNUng@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABoO8LfdhDCaQbEogwzp1fwtGdS6UogETey-4pN4ZaDQcQJUfw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+jLkhX+S7Sr1FmEb=wUYoiT1fxj=HkJpCa9E7gjkMTccCdXsg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ali,

Is there a copy of the logo which doesn't include the small text in the
corner?

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Ali Ok <aliok at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> According to the voting, logo #6 is the most favorite one. Here is the
> summary:
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> I am delighted to present you AeroGear Digger's logo:
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
> Cheers,
> Ali
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Ali Ok <aliok at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We would like to pick a logo for the new AeroGear module, Digger [1].
>>
>> James Cobb has already prepared some great designs and now we vote to
>> pick the best one [2].
>>
>> We have prepared a Google poll (no login required) here:
>> https://goo.gl/forms/WdUoHecQtrshMkBg1
>>
>> The poll will be open for 10 days (until June 29th 10:00 AM UTC).
>>
>>
>> [1] : https://github.com/aerogear/digger-jenkins
>> [2] : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DESIGN-943
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ali
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 

LAURA FITZGERALD

Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>

Communications House, Cork Road

Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33

lfitzger at redhat.com    IM: lfitzgerald
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/48d600f8/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2017-06-29 at 22.58.31.png
Type: image/png
Size: 77274 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/48d600f8/attachment-0002.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: aerogeardigger_logo_r1v6.png
Type: image/png
Size: 30735 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/48d600f8/attachment-0003.png 

From jfrizell at redhat.com  Fri Oct  6 07:10:06 2017
From: jfrizell at redhat.com (John Frizelle)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:10:06 +0100
Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Digger Logo
In-Reply-To: <CA+jLkhX+S7Sr1FmEb=wUYoiT1fxj=HkJpCa9E7gjkMTccCdXsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABoO8Le_xkQMiTx1Xemd_CJXw3B-zCgvZyyFF0XLLXTdNDNUng@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABoO8LfdhDCaQbEogwzp1fwtGdS6UogETey-4pN4ZaDQcQJUfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+jLkhX+S7Sr1FmEb=wUYoiT1fxj=HkJpCa9E7gjkMTccCdXsg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJFhnM51UkgjBFA3iPq6K12gLEuXVa5pJkQAgcOYHBphpNHjQw@mail.gmail.com>

Here you go - I just cropped the other one to remove the small text.

--
John Frizelle
Chief Architect, Red Hat Mobile
Consulting Engineer

mobile: *+353 87 290 1644 <//+353872901644>*
twitter:* @johnfriz*
skype: *john_frizelle*
mail: *jfrizell at redhat.com <jfrizell at redhat.com>*




On 6 October 2017 at 10:58, Laura Fitzgerald <lfitzger at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Ali,
>
> Is there a copy of the logo which doesn't include the small text in the
> corner?
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Ali Ok <aliok at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> According to the voting, logo #6 is the most favorite one. Here is the
>> summary:
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> I am delighted to present you AeroGear Digger's logo:
>>
>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ali
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Ali Ok <aliok at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We would like to pick a logo for the new AeroGear module, Digger [1].
>>>
>>> James Cobb has already prepared some great designs and now we vote to
>>> pick the best one [2].
>>>
>>> We have prepared a Google poll (no login required) here:
>>> https://goo.gl/forms/WdUoHecQtrshMkBg1
>>>
>>> The poll will be open for 10 days (until June 29th 10:00 AM UTC).
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] : https://github.com/aerogear/digger-jenkins
>>> [2] : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DESIGN-943
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ali
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> LAURA FITZGERALD
>
> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> Communications House, Cork Road
>
> Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33
>
> lfitzger at redhat.com    IM: lfitzgerald
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/39e912d6/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: aerogeardigger_logo_r1v6.png
Type: image/png
Size: 30735 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/39e912d6/attachment-0004.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2017-06-29 at 22.58.31.png
Type: image/png
Size: 77274 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/39e912d6/attachment-0005.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11472 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/39e912d6/attachment-0006.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: aerogeardigger_logo_r1v6.png
Type: image/png
Size: 20777 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/39e912d6/attachment-0007.png 

From lfitzger at redhat.com  Fri Oct  6 07:36:17 2017
From: lfitzger at redhat.com (Laura Fitzgerald)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:36:17 +0100
Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Digger
Message-ID: <CA+jLkhU0BhzKzCu9MzP1XrtcweVb9v4ZHuukp5d3hZZWREpOJQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

Check out this blog
<https://medium.com/@laurafitzgeraldsemail/ever-feel-like-this-when-building-your-mobile-apps-f1940e627ab6>
and
video <https://youtu.be/IS5WOon1l50> on AeroGear Digger.
-- 

LAURA FITZGERALD

Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>

Communications House, Cork Road

Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33

lfitzger at redhat.com    IM: lfitzgerald
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/9bdded6d/attachment.html 

From lrossett at redhat.com  Fri Oct  6 08:43:24 2017
From: lrossett at redhat.com (Leonardo Rossetti)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:43:24 -0300
Subject: [aerogear-dev] rfc repository
Message-ID: <CAF-nxa-wVE5jndeBR=-ZE_GBBuw3DCTP5S8a7C98H3KJfQ9LyQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

I was thinking if we could create a "proposals/rfc" repository in
Aerogear's GH organization, as the name implies, it would contain
enhancement proposals for all Aerogear projects.

My main motivation for this is to have a public and official place to track
all enhancements/ideas.

I this repository could contain:

   - proposal document template
   - track proposals status:
      - draff
      - approved
      - implementation
      - done

A couple of projects use this approach: ansible
<https://github.com/ansible/proposals>, rust
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs>, python <https://github.com/python/peps>,
and the list goes on.

WDYT?

-- 

LEONARDO ROSSETTI

SOFTWARE ENGINEER

Red Hat SP <https://www.redhat.com/>

lrossett at redhat.com    M: 11997030621
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/628761c2/attachment.html 

From omatskiv at redhat.com  Fri Oct  6 09:04:45 2017
From: omatskiv at redhat.com (Oleh Mackiv)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:04:45 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] rfc repository
In-Reply-To: <CAF-nxa-wVE5jndeBR=-ZE_GBBuw3DCTP5S8a7C98H3KJfQ9LyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF-nxa-wVE5jndeBR=-ZE_GBBuw3DCTP5S8a7C98H3KJfQ9LyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALimhXoz3ZHjr3hijSmW=f-CoOGZZ2Jh8xAZ=pi5b43EcSv9hQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Leonardo,

personally I think that using GitHub issues in respective projects would be
easier. Issue comments are perfect for discussion. PRs can be nicely linked
to issues. Etc.

Best regards,
Oleg

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Leonardo Rossetti <lrossett at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I was thinking if we could create a "proposals/rfc" repository in
> Aerogear's GH organization, as the name implies, it would contain
> enhancement proposals for all Aerogear projects.
>
> My main motivation for this is to have a public and official place to
> track all enhancements/ideas.
>
> I this repository could contain:
>
>    - proposal document template
>    - track proposals status:
>       - draff
>       - approved
>       - implementation
>       - done
>
> A couple of projects use this approach: ansible
> <https://github.com/ansible/proposals>, rust
> <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs>, python
> <https://github.com/python/peps>, and the list goes on.
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
>
> LEONARDO ROSSETTI
>
> SOFTWARE ENGINEER
>
> Red Hat SP <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> lrossett at redhat.com    M: 11997030621
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Oleg Matskiv
Associate Quality Engineer
Red Hat Mobile Application Platform
omatskiv at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/1a9fc9aa/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Fri Oct  6 09:52:06 2017
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:52:06 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] rfc repository
In-Reply-To: <CALimhXoz3ZHjr3hijSmW=f-CoOGZZ2Jh8xAZ=pi5b43EcSv9hQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF-nxa-wVE5jndeBR=-ZE_GBBuw3DCTP5S8a7C98H3KJfQ9LyQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALimhXoz3ZHjr3hijSmW=f-CoOGZZ2Jh8xAZ=pi5b43EcSv9hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2Tu7Gx59FU+sw2SbNU3bEAetnuYjoQ=4ZJWCqQaea-_NA@mail.gmail.com>

for some reason, we use JIRA - issues are disabled by most AG projects,
like most in JBoss middleware

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Oleh Mackiv <omatskiv at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello Leonardo,
>
> personally I think that using GitHub issues in respective projects would
> be easier. Issue comments are perfect for discussion. PRs can be nicely
> linked to issues. Etc.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleg
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Leonardo Rossetti <lrossett at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was thinking if we could create a "proposals/rfc" repository in
>> Aerogear's GH organization, as the name implies, it would contain
>> enhancement proposals for all Aerogear projects.
>>
>> My main motivation for this is to have a public and official place to
>> track all enhancements/ideas.
>>
>> I this repository could contain:
>>
>>    - proposal document template
>>    - track proposals status:
>>       - draff
>>       - approved
>>       - implementation
>>       - done
>>
>> A couple of projects use this approach: ansible
>> <https://github.com/ansible/proposals>, rust
>> <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs>, python
>> <https://github.com/python/peps>, and the list goes on.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> --
>>
>> LEONARDO ROSSETTI
>>
>> SOFTWARE ENGINEER
>>
>> Red Hat SP <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>> lrossett at redhat.com    M: 11997030621
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Oleg Matskiv
> Associate Quality Engineer
> Red Hat Mobile Application Platform
> omatskiv at redhat.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/b87ea706/attachment-0001.html 

From aliok at redhat.com  Thu Oct 19 04:04:00 2017
From: aliok at redhat.com (Ali Ok)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:04:00 +0300
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Youtube
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2RO1n4pDOSn5OE90Lz3XCZWnk2XzFUefOX05mRCXJup-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+jLkhXRX6Tqs3-3PCiP34rbeho4m4Tf9hnsYunx6-M3QQ0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADF=h2tSOJXY82MMkf=yjj8RpKLnKWgX+t=dz_qQ9BD7OCR8KA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO0+n+ryEem9wQoKTaOnwuRbQn-v=71uR+3FyTx3T4w=2x=How@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RO1n4pDOSn5OE90Lz3XCZWnk2XzFUefOX05mRCXJup-w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABoO8Le03j=J31fiBwjYYcqXdwFZkX3RTgFUrSNdO7OG503fbw@mail.gmail.com>

Hey,

Can you guys add this one https://youtu.be/DxPgJcD6KSY to that AG community
channel?
Or, how can I do it myself?

Thanks,
Ali

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> I think passos is right w/ the AG community channel ;-)
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Wojciech Trocki <wtrocki at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There is also RedHat videos channel if you looking to host some product
>> getting started etc.
>> https://www.youtube.com/user/RedHatVideos
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Laura,
>>>
>>> There is the AeroGear Channel[1]
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgDcDoN2b7cEI63fgpxACBA
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Laura Fitzgerald <lfitzger at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> Is there an existing youtube channel for aerogear videos/demos?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> LAURA FITZGERALD
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>
>>>> Communications House, Cork Road
>>>>
>>>> Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33
>>>>
>>>> lfitzger at redhat.com    IM: lfitzgerald
>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -- Passos
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> WOJCIECH TROCKI
>>
>> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>> IM: wtrocki
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171019/778faa21/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Fri Oct 20 03:58:38 2017
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:58:38 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Fwd: [Aerogear-users] AeroGear Digger - installation
 and E2E app building demo
In-Reply-To: <CABoO8Lf=J+qXGcRdq1yS0RHV6vpcmZz9AzNSaHvLTVzU189xxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABoO8Lf=J+qXGcRdq1yS0RHV6vpcmZz9AzNSaHvLTVzU189xxw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2SSFwANkjg4=ENAH1fNC6fDpF62XdZ-9SqLVJD9vEXLGQ@mail.gmail.com>

perhaps also interesting for the dev list:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ali Ok <aliok at redhat.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:11 AM
Subject: [Aerogear-users] AeroGear Digger - installation and E2E app
building demo
To: aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org


Hello,

I would like to share this demo video of AeroGear Digger with you:
https://youtu.be/DxPgJcD6KSY

It basically shows everything you need to kick start AeroGear Digger:

- Starting up an OpenShift cluster to install AeroGear Digger on it
- Installing a AeroGear Digger instance from scratch
- Building a sample application and installing it on a device
- Using AeroGear Digger CLI

Instructions used in the demo video is available in the README file in the
repository: https://github.com/aerogear/digger-jenkins

Thanks Laura Fitzgerald for the nice voice over!

Greetings,
Ali

_______________________________________________
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users




-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171020/e945fe2d/attachment.html 

From aliok at redhat.com  Thu Oct 26 06:32:53 2017
From: aliok at redhat.com (Ali Ok)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:32:53 +0300
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Digger repository renaming
Message-ID: <CABoO8Lez+_ME9CEuDLS6YCUYoTHoRMvLkcST7zHXC=fHmdj1uA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,
We are renaming the Digger Github repositories.


   - digger-jenkins ---> aerogear-digger
   - digger-java --> aerogear-digger-java-client
   - digkins --> aerogear-digger-node-client
   - digger-installer --> aerogear-digger-installer


Related JIRA: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDIGGER-203

I will send another email once everything is done.

Cheers,
Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171026/5477ff4b/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Thu Oct 26 07:44:32 2017
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:44:32 +0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] Digger repository renaming
In-Reply-To: <CABoO8Lez+_ME9CEuDLS6YCUYoTHoRMvLkcST7zHXC=fHmdj1uA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABoO8Lez+_ME9CEuDLS6YCUYoTHoRMvLkcST7zHXC=fHmdj1uA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2QgmrjNzS+E_py=x4FrLGAnF_hj2tiePOf2S5goBOf3eg@mail.gmail.com>

+1

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Ali Ok <aliok at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> We are renaming the Digger Github repositories.
>
>
>    - digger-jenkins ---> aerogear-digger
>    - digger-java --> aerogear-digger-java-client
>    - digkins --> aerogear-digger-node-client
>    - digger-installer --> aerogear-digger-installer
>
>
> Related JIRA: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDIGGER-203
>
> I will send another email once everything is done.
>
> Cheers,
> Ali
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171026/149b5116/attachment-0001.html 

From dpassos at redhat.com  Mon Oct 30 07:56:50 2017
From: dpassos at redhat.com (Daniel Passos)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:56:50 -0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Sync Maintain
Message-ID: <CADF=h2ur5ORFtP3HgrgO3jVPUhvTKD6WZQfdNLcK3kjOeHUbsQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi

We are not investing time on AeroGear Sync for a long time and now we are
working in a Sync feature for Feedhenry Sync.

Should we deprecate it and add a notice on the README repos?

-- 
-- Passos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171030/4eb1abae/attachment.html 

From dpassos at redhat.com  Mon Oct 30 08:00:11 2017
From: dpassos at redhat.com (Daniel Passos)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:00:11 -0200
Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Android Offline
Message-ID: <CADF=h2vvyf1==K53UKeSLnSx-V+GSSpNZToe7fNsYJKeLG3wig@mail.gmail.com>

A long time ago we try to draft an offline library, we have created an
aerogear-android-offline GH repo, but we did not work too much on it there
and never released it.

Should we delete this repo or only add a notice on the README

-- 
-- Passos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171030/4b1853d5/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Tue Oct 31 05:13:54 2017
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:13:54 +0100
Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Sync Maintain
In-Reply-To: <CADF=h2ur5ORFtP3HgrgO3jVPUhvTKD6WZQfdNLcK3kjOeHUbsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADF=h2ur5ORFtP3HgrgO3jVPUhvTKD6WZQfdNLcK3kjOeHUbsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2Tuep3EXACUBfVdE+jcknM7nzTKf-8XL1kbXCc63+h2zQ@mail.gmail.com>

sounds right to me ...

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> We are not investing time on AeroGear Sync for a long time and now we are
> working in a Sync feature for Feedhenry Sync.
>
> Should we deprecate it and add a notice on the README repos?
>
> --
> -- Passos
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171031/84930f34/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Tue Oct 31 05:14:12 2017
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:14:12 +0100
Subject: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Android Offline
In-Reply-To: <CADF=h2vvyf1==K53UKeSLnSx-V+GSSpNZToe7fNsYJKeLG3wig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADF=h2vvyf1==K53UKeSLnSx-V+GSSpNZToe7fNsYJKeLG3wig@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2T_i_BcjTQYa7=7C44Y56HkH2uzyWw+SUYep6N0OCRomg@mail.gmail.com>

adding a notice is fine, IMO - deleting not needed ...

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:

> A long time ago we try to draft an offline library, we have created an
> aerogear-android-offline GH repo, but we did not work too much on it there
> and never released it.
>
> Should we delete this repo or only add a notice on the README
>
> --
> -- Passos
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171031/52766765/attachment.html